7/4/2006 7:34:09 AM
<<< Like i said before God cannot be proven with science. >>>
Correct, because God is an untestable hypothesis.
<<< Pluse God has been proven several times in the bible. >>>
No, he has been asserted without proof. Any evidence that the Bible should be considered a reliable source?
7/4/2006 10:19:33 PM
Pluse don't let me be misunderstood.
2/1/2008 12:55:38 AM
"Like i said before God cannot be proven with science."
This is true.
"Pluse God has been proven several times in the bible."
First, learn to spell. Second, the bible is not necessarily a reliable source, as the proposed occurrences and proofs were so long ago and not reproducible it's impossible to say the bible is accurate. Therefore it remains impossible to claim the existance of "God" or any other divine being by using the bible or any other sacred texts as those texts may not be accurate to actual occurences.
2/1/2008 7:21:14 AM
And outside of the bible? Not so much.
2/1/2008 10:33:29 AM
Ah, we have the holy quadrinity now: The father, the son, the holy spirit and the Pluse God.
2/1/2008 1:26:48 PM
Just like Hogwarts is proven to exist many times in the Harry Potter books.
2/1/2008 3:26:26 PM
What is this word: "Pluse"?
7/7/2011 11:23:25 AM
your lack of basic human reasoning and sheer gullibility has made your god real in your head.
you will be stupid as fuck forever.
7/7/2011 11:52:31 AM
The Bible can say whatever the hell it wants. Until I see proof outside of that wretched blood-soaked book, God's just a convenient excuse for people to treat others unjustly.
7/7/2011 6:04:13 PM
7/8/2011 1:42:01 AM