Sterilize the woman who has had an abortion.
If a woman doesn't want children, eliminate their ability to reproduce. Their "breed" would eventually die out leaving women with genuine maternal instincts to care for the children in society. Sterilization also has the side benefit of eliminating the issue of repeat abortions.
It's always seemed like a practical solution to me.
69 comments
Yeah, because a woman who has an abortion NEVER decides to have a child later. Ever.
Paschal hit the nail right on the head, frankly...
"Their 'breed' would eventually die out leaving women with genuine maternal instincts to care for the children in society."
Yeah, because no childfree person ever had parents.
Oh. Wait...
And as a childfree woman myself, I can tell you that it is damn near impossible to get sterilised at a young age. So many people assume that we'll change our minds. Most annoying!
I have crazy maternal instincts. I want a baby every time I see one. But rationally, I know that getting pregnant would severely endanger my health, and I would probably develop terrible post-partum depression once I gave birth. I don't want to go through that or put any child of mine through that. So I would have an abortion were I to get pregnant. So fuck you.
So...abortions are hereditary? What?
So, yeah. Sterilize rape victims, ectopic pregnancies, pregnant teens, and all those other cruel, hateful bitches. Perfectly practical solution. NOT.
And again, you morons want to TAKE AWAY OUR RIGHTS, OUR CHOICES.
Some of us *know* that we're not cut out to be parents. Some of us are infertile. Some are lesbians. Some are asexual. Should that, then, deprive us of pursuing pleasure and happiness with a mate, simply because it doesn't "fit in" with your worldview?
What a dumbass.
Well, vasectomy works as a practical solution for me, and what's wrong with tubal ligation? Party on.
Whoa, dude, it's like toobyooler! Rilly!
@ Frogflayer- Easy on them? EASY ON THEM?
WTF would Camp director do then? Kill them?
Hang on.... thats probably it.
If Christians don't want lust, chemicaly castrate them to eliminate their ability to feel it. Seems like a practical solution to me.
I can see some people having problems with this high-handed assault upon human self determination, but at least Elmo Q's on my side!
If fundies don't want modern society, don't let them have any. No electricity, vaccines or antibiotics. Their breed would eventually die out, leaving only intelligent people. Think of it as evolution in action.
Surgically remove the vocal cords of the woman who forces fundamentalist christianity upon her innocent children and traumatizes them with threats of hell and eternal punishment.
If a woman doesn't want her children terrorized, eliminate her ability to speak or teach. Their "breed" would eventually evolve to become more intelligent and less afraid, leaving these children with social and intellectual skills needed to effectively love and raise their own children to become confident, productive members of our society. Avoiding indoctrination also has the side benefit of eliminating sexual guilt and poisonous biblical beliefs regarding homosexuality, misogyny and racism.
It's always seemed like a practical solution to me.
There. All fixed. You're welcome.
@ Anon-e-moose:
Or perhaps, judging by his apparent hatred of women, Elmo Q. Shagnotatall?
Or Elmo Q. Hasn'tshaggedinawhileandisfuckingbitteraboutit?
It seemed like a practical solution to eugenicists as well. That same "solution" was advocated by some of the more fanatical eugenicists in the U.S. and resulted in the involuntary sterilization of Native American women who had never been pregnant, wanted children, and didn't know that they had been sterilized until several years later after numerous failed attempts to start a family.
Plus, since abortion is more aggressively advertised among racial minorities, said minorities are somewhat more likely to have abortions than white people. Thus, your "solution" to abortion would inevitably be considered racist by the rest of the world.
Princess Rot said: Is there a cut off point when a female child stops being something to be protected and becomes something to be despised like her mother?
Yes, there is a magical cut off point. It occurs right after the baby is born.
I suppose Dipshit Elmo would also advocate giving birth in cases like anencephaly, too. What a jack ass--way to show compassion!
Can we yank your balls off? I'm sure you've spanked it before and lost some sperm out of it, so you probably haven't got any paternal instinct. Seems fair.
By the way, my mother had an abortion in 1984, because that fetus was diseased/malformed and almost killed her. She went on to have my brother and I, and she loves children. In fact, she's a pediatrician. She has a hell of a lot of maternal instinct. It's just that, you know, the malformed Sibling X fetus wasn't as important as LIVING.
a sterile woman would engage in imceasing wild monkey sex. That would not be suitable in a Christian community because it would tempt men.
You really have to cut off her head, remove the heart, burn them both and dispose of in two seperate bodies of water.
What about those who don´t want children due to economic reasons?, you know, they can win the lottery some day................or those whose life is in danger and the baby would die ANYWAY?...........Do you think that maternal instinct is something that, once fixed, is always there?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.