If we came from Monkey's millions of years ago then why are their still monkey's here today and why are we not giving birth to monkey's and why aren't monkey's giving birth to humans. My Bible says this Genesis 1:24 And God said, "Let the Land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.
And that is what i am seeing happen today i see creatures producing after its kind.
I don't see monkey's producing (giving birth) humans or humans producing monkey's.
60 comments
Ah, venomfangx ...
ignorantly marching into the 22nd century, singing 'na,na,na,na I can't hear you' all the way at the top of his voice.
You would have thought that watching even just one of Thunderf00t's amazing video's would have prevented him from reiterating this utter nonsense.
But as we all know, Shawn is a compulsive liar for Jeebus.
If we came from dust/dirt/mud/shit/god'snutcrust 6,000 years ago, why does it still exist and why can we not see it forming people?
Same failed logic and general not knowing shit-ness.
First, evolution doesn't work that way, dumb ass.
"If we came from Monkey's millions of years ago then why are their still monkey's here today and why are we not giving birth to monkey's and why aren't monkey's giving birth to humans."
"Biblical prophecy relating to our current world events is proof enough that Jesus Christ does exist!"
-Biblical prophecy relating to our current world events is proof enough that Jesus Christ does exist! -
OR that ancient peoples observed that a cat will bear cats, and cows give birth to cows... ect.
Indeed, Ultranaught, that is a good question. Perhaps it's because of free will, but in that case, Jesus died in vain. Hmmm...
(The Watcher)
Dude, it's VenomFangX we're talking about here. No one with an ounce of common sense could take that Kirk Cameron wanna-be seriously, even if they wanted to. Bad grammar is the least of his many failures; trust me on this.
There i's no po's'sible excu'se for 'such a ridiculou's ineptitude in the u'se of 'something 'so ba'sic a's the apo'strophe, you illiterate twit. I can under'stand a typo, but you mi's'spelled 'monkey's' 'six time's in that minu'scule amount of word's!
Before you even 'start trying to figure out everything that i's wrong about biology in that pathetic wa'ste of language, could you at lea'st fini'sh elementary 'school?
Engli'sh i's my 'second language and I'm 'still offended by your ba'sic incompetence.
EDIT: Incidentally, I hope that video's passage was satire, Darn .
I can see the dvantage the bible has for you:
Well, most people grow up and start to think on their own and usually find out that the real world is more complex and isn´t well described within the bible.
I don't know how many times you fundies have to be told, but Evolution does not, repeat, does NOT say humans came from monkeys. Fundies say the humans came from monkeys.
Scientists and people who study evolution state that humans and apes have a common ancestor.
And you fundies have been claiming biblical prophecy applied to Napoleon and Jesus was coming.. wrong. Hitler and Jesus was coming.. wrong. Mohamar Kahdafi and Jesus was coming.. wrong.
I don't see monkey's producing (giving birth) humans or humans producing monkey's
You know what else you don't see? You don't see the DNA relating to goat coloring being influenced by placing colored sticks in front of them.
Biblical prophecy relating to our current world events is proof enough that Jesus Christ does exist!
Nostrodamus allegedly has a goodly number of proven prophecies to his name. Would you accept him as a prophet, or is he one of those nasty pawns of Satan?
I don't see donkeys talking or mountains melting.
Book of judges
Biblical prophecies are most likely coded references to the governments and empires of the time it was written rather than anything that's directly relevant to us in the 21st century, and your understanding of biology is somewhat flawed as well.
@Fanatic-Templar: Right with you. How does one of the easiest punctuation marks in the English language cause so much confusion, including among people who should really know better? I'd understand it if their first language was one which did use an apostrophe to form the plural, but I know of no such language.
Quoth the Raven, "And there the jackanapes capers through the ruins of the jungle temple. In a pool of ghostly moonlight stands Irene Turner-Cartwright the disconsolate daw. 'Wherefore goest ye thou impertinent fellow?' 'Oogh! Ugh!' straightway the jackanapes doth reply. Flapping her ragged cloak the Jackdaw doth beadily eye the jackanapes sagging testicles and his maggot-like penis. Irene thought to herself, 'That penis will be no good for Venus but it might make a meager tid-bit 'till tea-time.' Whereupon, from the shadows of the ruins, Hugh Gilligan the newt (cont. page 94)
The only place this idiot could have got this monkey notion is from his pastor. He would not have obtained this concept from his schooling in evolutionary science, because he can not have had any. He probably doesn't even know what a monkey is, unless he saw one at the zoo, and his desolate mountainside in wherever it is is unlikely to have one, if it even has a road. If he even went to school, he would have played hookey and hung around the local bus shelter.
Therefore his views are completely irrelevant. Why do we have to bother with such nonsense? We have seen it a thousand times on FSTDT, and it is getting very boring. There are many more fundie contributions to society which are more interesting or funny than this fucking monkey crap.
Please, guys, give it a rest. No more monkeys.
fergus
@Fanatic-Templar
no it wasn't, I'm Dutch ... we do plurals of some (mostly) foreign words like that.
It was a mistake .... me bad :(
@szaleniecI'd understand it if their first language was one which did use an apostrophe to form the plural, but I know of no such language.
well ... now you do ;)
We humans share at least 98% of our DNA with chimpanzees. Explain that.
If that isn't conclusive proof that Darwin was right all along, I don't know what is. And yet you fundies expect us to accept that the first human was formed from clay? In that case, humans would be silicon-based lifeforms.
"If we came from Monkey's millions of years ago then why are their still monkey's here today and why are we not giving birth to monkey's and why aren't monkey's giving birth to humans."
Why did you capitalise the first "monkey"? Why do you not know that "monkey's" indicates a possession of the monkey and that the plural for monkey is "monkieys" without an apostrophy? Why don't you use commas where appropriate? Why do you not know to put "?" at the end of questions? Why are you such a moron?
No, the plural of "monkey" is "monkeys."
If we're going to criticize fundy grammar, we need to make sure our own stands up to scrutiny.
Darn
It's all right, especially if it is correct grammar in your mother tongue, as szaleniec mentioned. Could have been a momentary brain lapse too, I know my writing isn't perfect either. I just mentioned it because it would have been a bit hypocritical of me not to, after that rant.
"If we came from Monkey's millions of years ago then why are their still monkey's here today"
I wondered how anyone could seriously use the most stereotypical dumb fundie argument ever, then I saw where oit was from.
Every time a fundamentalist talks about evolution as if he or she knows what he or she is talking about, I die a little inside.
Fundamentalism is a vicious cycle:
Fundie hates science -> Fundie goes to science class -> Fundie doesn't pay attention because he's already written it off -> Fundie claims to understand science -> Fundie hates science ...
"If we came from Monkey's millions of years ago then why are their still monkey's here today"
If science managed to elevate itself over religion, why is there still religion?
Because the living space can support both.
But the information apocalypse is happening. One of them has to go. And I like my computer too much and despise intentional schizophrenia, so religion will soon be gone. It serves no purpose and does a lot of hurt.
To be honest, this kind of thinking could be a reflection of their family tree.
(Apologies for the long sentence. It's a continuous thought.)
www.youtube.com/PresidentChristopher
What about Jepthae's vow, when he sacrificed his own daughter as a burnt offering to God? God allowing the MURDER of a human being as a burnt offering? I wish I could kick God in the BALLS for that shit, and the way He spits on women just like the men in that society'
This is all well and good, Gods (sic) Warrior, but it doesn't answer the really pertinent question, which is why you keep placing apostrophes in places where they don't belong, but forget them where they're needed: Is it cuz u is manki?
So, warrior of more than one god, did we come from monkey's 'what'?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
