As regards the evolution of life on Earth, it is very possibly related to, or indeed, very similar to the evolution of any extraterrestrial life that there may be in the universe. Of course, we don't know because we are unable to observe and study extraterrestrial life, which might, for all we know, evolve in a radically different way to life on Earth. We simply don't know whether or not it even exists.
So, until we are able to observe extraterrestrial life, all we have to go on is life on Earth. Therefore, for the time being, extraterrestrial life is irrelevant to current Earth bound studies, except for valid speculation that might unexpectedly throw some light on the subject.
I was unaware that Charles Darwin had any worshipers. You must tell me more about them, I'd be very interested in finding out more. I know that there are many who admire Darwin as one of the leading progenitors of evolutionary theory but hadn't realised that there were some that worshiped him. Doesn't sound like a very scientific thing to do, still, one never knows, we'll await further details.
"It's pretty hard for someone to draw conclusions on mankind when Darwin had never seen nor heard of UFOs. That's kind of like teaching math but not understanding trigonometry." A very strange statement indeed. No-one ever knows a subject in its entirety and no-one ever will, or has, Darwin included. For instance, one may be a first class mathematician and yet in say 150 years from now, somebody might discover a new branch of mathematics that might help solve old problems, but that wouldn't invalidate one as a first class mathematician of the here and now. Very odd.
Indeed, Darwin did see UFO's, although they weren't referred to by that acronym in his day, but many unidentified flying objects, or more accurately, birds, mammals and insects that were unknown to science and must have been observed with delight and wonder by him. If you are conflating UFO's with extraterrestrials, then see my first paragraph again.
I don't see your point in the next paragraph, something to do with pole-shifts and North American Indians?
Man is one of the latest to appear, but evolution still continues. I fail to see what a non-existent deity has to do with it?
Again, something of which I was unaware, who is it who makes the assertion that man evolved from monkeys, I'd be very interested to learn more. I thought that was a phrase used by bare-faced liars whose intent was deception and spin.
Love ya, Pule.
