how do explain these contradictions in science
Contradictions don't tend to last very long in fields of scientific endevor.
Like, how can monkeys evolve to be humans?
That's not a contradiction, it would only be a contradiction if there was some form of scientific principle that said "monkeys cannot evolve into humans", there is not. Incidently, no evolutionary scientists claim that monkeys evolved into humans either.
Science has proven that objects can only evolve to a lower state of being
Science has proven no such thing, but you have proven yourself to be a liar, therefore everything you say from this point on is suspect. Also, there is no such thing as a "lower state of being", evolution is not a linear progression of living things getting better and better, therefore there can be no "lower state of being". Living things are simply more or less fit to survive and reproduce in it's current enviroment.
making it impossible for the human race to start out as little specs of dust.
No, it doesn't.
And by the way, Darwin said before he died that his theory's were impossible
And by the way, you are either intending to decieve, or you are extremly gullible. Darwin said nothing of the sort, yet rather than looking into the veracity of that claim you choose to propagate a well known falsehood instead.... How pathetic.
but nobody listened to him because they finally had something to believe in.
You say that as if throughout the thousands of preceding years that no one ever had anything to "believe" in. That doesn't say much about your religion now does it?
