Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 5744

Even the evolutionists can't agree on most of their prominent theories. Why only one intelligent race? Explain the evolution of flight, did some primitive creature learn to climb trees, and fall out so much that it developed wings so it wouldn't bust it's little ass? I could shoot so many holes in your evolution theories that it's embarrassing, but I'm yet to have any one convince me of error in the Christian account of creation.

RTAHost, FirstCoastNews Talk Back! 8 Comments [12/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
transient

Congratulations for a brilliant rebuttal of Lamarckism. Now how about that evolution theory?

4/5/2006 11:10:29 PM

Quantum Mechanic

"Why only one intelligent race?"

Huh?

If there is one, and I doubt it, you're not a member.

1/28/2011 11:12:44 AM

Dr. Shrinker

"but I'm yet to have any one convince me of error in the Christian account of creation."

Which one, the one where animals were created and then mean and women, or the one where Adam was created, then the animals, then the woman? It seems your bible can't even agree with itself on one of it s most prominent, uhm, proposals?

1/28/2011 11:18:48 AM

jas43

"I could shoot so many holes in your evolution theories that it's embarrassing, but I'm yet to have any one convince me of error in the Christian account of creation."

lololololololol

fail.

no you cannot.

and you dont see the errors because you're a fool blinded by stupidity and "faith"

fuck off.

1/28/2011 12:24:08 PM

Thinking Violet

Which biblical account? Genesis I or Genesis 2?

They don't agree, you know,,,,, oh wait, what am I asking? Of course you don't know, you've never read the book.

1/28/2011 1:10:32 PM

KR

You mean like this?



*big grin*

(I know this sequence is quoted somewhere in here, but i couldn't find it...) Anyway, this is how creationists see evolution. *even more wider grin*

1/28/2011 1:32:13 PM

Ebon

Even the evolutionists can't agree on most of their prominent theories

Scientists are quibbling about the exact details of evolution. Very, very few disagree that evolution takes place, they're just discussing minor details. This is how healthy science works.

Why only one intelligent race?

Define "intelligent". And let me tell you, as a psychologist, it's more difficult to define than you might think.

Explain the evolution of flight, did some primitive creature learn to climb trees, and fall out so much that it developed wings so it wouldn't bust it's little ass?

No, that would be Lamarckism, a long-since-debunked theory. Scientists actually disagree on the origins of flight but, again, they are quibbling over the details, not discounting evolution itself.

I could shoot so many holes in your evolution theories that it's embarrassing, but I'm yet to have any one convince me of error in the Christian account of creation.

In other words, "I have nothing else to contribute but am unwilling to admit the fact".

9/3/2012 9:44:09 PM

Quantum Mechanic

Lie much?
"evolutionist" is the strawman of stupid shit.

11/20/2012 6:23:40 AM
1