1 2
#875937
Illuminatalie
Poe
1/30/2009 10:29:36 PM
#875953
aaa
What do you know about science?
1/30/2009 10:36:30 PM
#875958
DevilsChaplain
1/30/2009 10:39:08 PM
#876001
Dexter
Says who?
1/30/2009 11:17:25 PM
#876027
rw23
Arsewank.
1/30/2009 11:40:46 PM
#876085
Atheist In A Foxhole
Stoopid
1/31/2009 12:28:23 AM
#876095
tracer
Where "true scientists" are defined as "Those few people with a college degree who still support Creationism."
1/31/2009 12:38:18 AM
#876096
Lainey
Are Creationists going to come to their senses within my lifetime, do you think? I'm 30. Reading this crap all the time, and having friends who don't believe in evolution because their daddy or pastor said not to, makes me sad. :o(
1/31/2009 12:38:26 AM
#876106
Affine Connection
Biology isn't science? Who knew?
1/31/2009 12:45:38 AM
#876116
Devonian
"Are Creationists going to come to their senses within my lifetime, do you think?"
They've been at it for 150 years, I wouldn't bet on it...
Proof:
http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/demise.html
1/31/2009 1:00:25 AM
#876135
Old Viking
Yes, Don, yes. You're absolutely right. <pats top of Dan's head>
1/31/2009 1:34:48 AM
#876236
Ya can bray it all day long, it still won't be true.
1/31/2009 4:28:41 AM
#876240
LOLWUT
I don't find your evidence compelling, DON. I'm sure you understand.
1/31/2009 4:32:30 AM
#876252
Chris
Ya know DON is right? Science can offer nothing but evidence to support Darwinism.
1/31/2009 4:57:17 AM
#876278
Grimesy
All together now: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DARWINISM!
1/31/2009 5:49:58 AM
#876303
Undecided
I always wonder what people mean by Darwinism. Do they mean evolution as Darwin proposed it? Do they mean the body of research inspired by Darwin?
1/31/2009 6:34:58 AM
#876312
Hakar
Sounds like an argument someone might have used, say, 140 years ago.
1/31/2009 6:46:10 AM
#876328
TheDoc
That was an interesting revelation, DON. Thank you for that.
1/31/2009 7:08:20 AM
#876340
Thinking Allowed
What is darwinism?
1/31/2009 7:29:09 AM
#876456
Lulzmonger
Hurrdurrhurrr...
1/31/2009 3:30:48 PM
#876724
agentCDE
[citation needed]
2/1/2009 12:56:03 AM
#876737
I will never understand you guys and your rabid hatred for a man who died over 120 years ago.
2/1/2009 1:07:58 AM
#876898
Zoo
Natural selection has been everything but disproven. That was Darwin's most important contribution. In the intervening time we've refined our knowledge of how natural selection works, and identified other types of selection and how they work.
Everything else? Well, consider the technology, techniques and knowledge he had to work with at the time. He was on the right track in many cases, even if he wasn't quite right. The process of science is to take what we think we know and try to prove it wrong. If we do prove it wrong, we come up with other possible explanations and try to prove them wrong. If we can't we tentatively accept those ideas as true, until we either have lots of evidence to support them (and even then we don't quit looking for that one case that will make us revise them) or find the case that disproves them. All of our theories are open to question at all times; they, unlike a certain book I know of, are not set in stone. You can't just wish them overturned though, especially with mountains of evidence to support them. You have to bring scientifically valid (non-supernatural, repeatable) evidence to the table. Do that and we'll take you seriously. Nobody's done that yet.
2/1/2009 3:32:55 AM
#877050
Random Man
"Anybody teaching Darwinism should be run out of town."
You need to outnumber us for that to happen.
2/1/2009 6:21:35 AM
#877305
John-in_Oz
You can prove 'Darwinism' isn't a religion by the fact they don't kill heretics.
2/1/2009 1:17:27 PM
1 2