Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 57554

(Customer review for Evolution: A Theory In Crisis)
I did a comparative study on this and the Species of Origin. I have to say, I was once an evolutionist, but I now I realize how much blind faith I held in it.

Isobel, http://www.amazon.com 37 Comments [1/29/2009 8:56:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Illuminatalie
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
#874489
The Outsider

Why does this sound like the Discovery Institute has been doing a little astroturfing?

1/29/2009 8:56:30 PM

#874492
iflurry

Yeah, you and a million others.

1/29/2009 8:56:56 PM

#874494
thefoolish

It's true. Research, evidence, and logic = blind faith. Following something that was written in a book thousands of years ago, and has only changed enough to cover its butt = a solid theory.

1/29/2009 8:58:56 PM

#874499
Bored One-time Poster

"Species of Origin?" "Evolutionist?" "Blind faith?"

Are those burning pants I smell?

1/29/2009 8:59:49 PM

#874503
Horrible book, gave me the craps

Well that's your problem. I don't have 'faith' in anything. I know from the evidence that evolution is the best explanation from the diversity of life.

I'm Charles Darwin and I support this message.

1/29/2009 9:01:05 PM

#874510
TauRaven

Isobel? Do you also turn into a hawk at dawn? Must be teh ebilutionary magic..

1/29/2009 9:04:06 PM

#874515
Papabear

I don't believe you'd know how to do a comparitive study if your life depended on it. I don't believe you did a comparitive study. I don't believe you read OoS. I don't believe you realy believe blind faith to be a bad thing.

1/29/2009 9:08:21 PM

#874519
Carbonated Margarine

Species of Origin? The say you heck.

1/29/2009 9:14:02 PM

#874520
Dark_Lord_Prime

The "Species of Origin," you say? Was that written by Darwin Charles?

1/29/2009 9:14:26 PM

#874521
aaa

So, why did you went to the blind and deaf?

1/29/2009 9:15:06 PM

#874528


We can tell you're lying because you used the term "evolutionist". Stop padding the reviews just to spread your fundie stupidity.

1/29/2009 9:16:51 PM

#874533
Psittacosis

Species of Origin? Is this like State of Origin for aliens?

1/29/2009 9:19:44 PM

#874537
????

"I've been drinking acetic acid, but now I realise how bad it is, so now I drink hydrochloric acid."

1/29/2009 9:20:38 PM

#874543
Mister Spak

If you call yourself an evolutionist, you never were one.

1/29/2009 9:22:30 PM

#874549
Doctor Whom

I did a comparative study on this and the Species of Origin.

Either Yoda you are, or study it at all you didn't, since otherwise what it is called you would know.

1/29/2009 9:25:49 PM

#874578
BobsOldSocks

You're a big, fat, smelly liar.

1/29/2009 9:39:20 PM

#874583
Malkavian Jeff

Since when did evolution explain the origin of life?

1/29/2009 9:44:02 PM

#874587
Canadiest

Liar, What prove do you have against it that not immediatly dismissable (religious creation stories) or critiques from the professional world (rare and only on some finer details)

1/29/2009 9:45:59 PM

#874610
Headache

Species of Origin

There you go, you haven't even opened the book and can't even spell it correctly. You are nothing but a fucking liar! What does the babble say about where liars like you end up?

1/29/2009 10:05:15 PM

#874643
Xotan

'Species of Origin'??????

That explains it then. When you have read Origin of Species you may be wiser.

1/29/2009 10:23:59 PM

#874737
Mat

There are (many) legitimate problems with the ToE.

However, "Godditit" is not one of them.

1/29/2009 10:58:59 PM

#874950
Old Viking

Backwards you talk.

1/30/2009 12:37:56 AM

#875040
Reverend Jeremiah

Its not right to lie for Jesus.

P.S. - do a little bit more book reading before you try to impersonate someone who undestands evolution.

1/30/2009 1:40:53 AM

#875095
SpankyZeHam

I did a comparative study on this and the "Species of Origin"

WTF? lol!

1/30/2009 3:10:33 AM

#875284
David B.

@Bored One-time Poster/#926938:

There's nothing wrong with the term "evolutionist" and it is regularly used by evolutionists in the scientific literature.

A test of the chromosomal theory of ecotypic speciation in Anopheles gambiae
Nicholas C. Manoukis, Jeffrey R. Powell, Mahamoudou B. Touré, Adama Sacko, Frances E. Edillo, Mamadou B. Coulibaly, Sekou F. Traoré, Charles E. Taylor, and Nora J. Besansky.
PNAS 105:2940-2945, 2008.

Abstract

The role of chromosomal inversions in speciation has long been of interest to evolutionists. Recent quantitative modeling has stimulated reconsideration of previous conceptual models for chromosomal speciation. Anopheles gambiae, the most important vector of human malaria, carries abundant chromosomal inversion polymorphism nonrandomly associated with ecotypes that mate assortatively. Here, we consider the potential role of paracentric inversions in promoting speciation in A. gambiae via “ecotypification,” a term that refers to differentiation arising from local adaptation.

1/30/2009 11:38:41 AM
1 2