Quote# 57630

[irony irony irony irony irony irony]

Agreed, but there is compelling evidence: http://www.genesispark.com/genpark/ancient/ancient.htm http://www.dinosaursandman.com/index.php?option=com_zoom&Itemid=15&catid=13

I have nothing against science, what I do have a problem with is the ideologically laden speculation based on philosophic suppositions and presuppositions which is trumped up as science, even though the scientific method is not employed.

jmsnooks, deviantART 29 Comments [2/1/2009 5:40:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: mngamojemo

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom

Potentate Argyros

Wut? Huh? Word salad.... it burnzzzzz

2/1/2009 5:57:29 AM

colonel catastrophe

Do you know what the scientific method is?

2/1/2009 5:59:56 AM


So do I. I'm glad we agree, jmsnooks.

While we're basking in the afterglow of agreement, let me ask you, doesn't it just twist your socks when creationists mask their unfounded theses under the guise of science by calling it intelligent design and touting it as a scientific theory?

Don't you sometimes feel like smacking the heads a few creationist "scientists" together and screaming at them to get a clue?

2/1/2009 6:06:44 AM


2/1/2009 6:07:13 AM


Your "compelling" evidence is nothing more than the same old collection of known hoaxes (I'm surprised I didn't see the Paluxy Tracks or Zuiyo-maru carcass trotted out!), probable hoaxes, misidentifications, and shit vague enough to be anything. Try harder next time...

2/1/2009 6:18:36 AM


jmsnooks shows a level of arrogance in his fail that's worldclass.

I have debated with people far more educated and informed than you, college professors, biochemists, biologists, etc. and all of the arguments for any given stage of evolutionism are predicated on special pleading and ethos based arguments

Definitely a five.

2/1/2009 6:35:35 AM


I eat turds

2/1/2009 6:38:46 AM



2/1/2009 6:39:44 AM


I have nothing against science,

We wouldn't know, since you're only attacking strawman versions of science.

2/1/2009 6:41:49 AM


You owe me a new irony meter, as well as a new cellphone, as mine was sitting next to it when it violently melted down.

2/1/2009 7:33:39 AM


Wait Wait Wait. Were you talking about evolutionists or creationists in the last sentence? because for the love of me i can't seem to apply that sentence to scientists. Probably because of the words "philosophic" "suppositions and presuppositions" and "ideologically"

2/1/2009 8:14:28 AM

Grigori Yefimovich

Long words do not put a shine on shit.

2/1/2009 8:15:12 AM


Too easy.

2/1/2009 10:58:29 AM


2/1/2009 11:49:38 AM


Five irony meters have been deployed near your residence. They are set to detonate when you say something idiotic like that. Stop being an idiot or they will 'splode.

2/1/2009 12:01:42 PM

Percy Q. Shun

You can polish a turd,
And you can polish a turd...

But it's still a turd.

2/1/2009 12:15:42 PM


Coprolites for brain.

2/1/2009 12:23:12 PM


There's a bunch of big words in there. Are you sure you know what you are doing?

2/1/2009 12:24:54 PM


It's still shit son.

2/1/2009 12:43:09 PM


You have nothing against bullshit science or fable depiction. Your links have been both debunked by arceologists and historians who know a hell of a lot more about these items, who made them and what their culture was than any creationist will ever know.

Those always avoid other depictions that show totally unknown (mythological or badly rendered) animals from the same era. See, Real scientest don't throw the uncollaberating things away because they have professional ethics or they afraid of being called out by a peer.

2/1/2009 1:39:26 PM


Because you've read not only those two websites, but the tons (probably literally, paper is heavy) of journal articles exploring the mechanisms of evolution? Didn't think so.

2/1/2009 2:05:55 PM

Mister Spak

A bible theme park is not compelling evidence.

2/1/2009 3:17:28 PM

Bored One-time Poster

Can we really expect anything better from a guy who complains that evolution is impossible to repeat and hasn't been observed, while presenting the alternative idea that a bearded sky-man magicked everything into existence for some reason.

2/1/2009 5:22:25 PM


jmsnooks and others who use these various "dinosaur" arguments miss an important point: when dinosaurs went extinct, and indeed, whether they went extinct at all, is irrelevant to the ToE. Coelacanths were thought to have gone extinct at the same time as the dinosaurs, and we found one alive and well in 1938. Nobody said " uh oh, there goes Darwin's whole theory". His link, with stuff about the old Paluxy Man-Track nonsense and bells found in coal, is meaningless.

2/1/2009 6:55:18 PM

doomie 22

@ solomongrundy: Wow. This shithead claims to have out debated all those scientists yet he still finds time to dick around on deviantART...

2/1/2009 8:10:43 PM

1 2 | top: comments page