Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 57829

For the sake of decency, I won't show any of Carrie Underwood's immodest photos here; BUT, there are plenty. It is appalling for any professed "Christian" woman to dress immodestly like the world, wearing low-cut blouses, miniskirts, and other seductive clothing. In one photo, Underwood is wearing a split frontal blouse where both of her breasts are partially exposed. This is sinful. Furthermore, some of the photo POSITIONS which Underwood has posed for are disgusting. In one shot, she purposely puts forth her right arm while sitting to allow for a visible shot of her right breast hanging down. Although she is clothed in the photo, it is clear what she is doing. It's all part of the evil marketing methods used in the music industry...sex sells. In other photos, Underwood is wearing worn-out and torn faded jeans. Is this the dress of 1st Timothy 2:9, "In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety..." Carrie Underwood is attracting MILLIONS of young Christian girls to herself, and teaching them by her example that it's ok to dress immodestly, disobeying the Lord's command to PUT SOME CLOTHES ON. Only a total heathen fool would contend that partially exposing a woman's breasts is acceptable. It is sinful for any woman to dress immodestly, especially for a professed "Christian."

David J. Stewart, Jesus Is Savior 43 Comments [2/8/2009 1:02:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By:
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
#887099
mrsyoungie

Does anyone else figure that DJS was drooling as he wrote this?

2/8/2009 1:05:41 PM

#887110
Alex

Drooling? Or frothing at the mouth

2/8/2009 1:12:09 PM

#887112
aaa

Kid, get laid or get out.

2/8/2009 1:13:24 PM

#887113
ToEtheline

I hope you didnt mess up your keyboard dude.

That was one horny description!

2/8/2009 1:14:01 PM

#887138
solomongrundy

OK, so I'm a middle-aged man in the UK, I had no idea who Carrie Underwood was.
So I googled her, without any net-nanny-nonsense working. She's very attractive I'm sure but I wouldn't say any of the pics I saw were NSFW.

2/8/2009 1:26:17 PM

#887209
Katsuro

David J. Stewart, always good for a laugh...

...and then I remember he's allowed out in public, near women, without supervision.

2/8/2009 1:52:32 PM

#887253
Nowonmai

You must cream in your jeans, and have stroke (both versions) whenever you see Olympic gymnasts, huh?

2/8/2009 2:08:32 PM

#887263
Ken

Carrie has nice legs, dude. You're either jealous or horny. Perhaps both. If you're not a Poe, you make me sad.

2/8/2009 2:13:28 PM

#887308
atheist crusader

your hatred of women is awe inspiring, have you ever considered converting to islam?????

2/8/2009 2:43:08 PM

#887339
Ellytoad

Sinful? ooooh, naughty!

2/8/2009 2:58:59 PM

#887378
a mind far far away

Ah, Davey, back to your same old shit, huh. Just give it a rest.

2/8/2009 3:15:09 PM

#887396
anon

Get a life David - and get your head out of your KJV Bible.

2/8/2009 3:23:39 PM

#887402


Are those the faint sounds of fapping I hear?

2/8/2009 3:24:57 PM

#887433
Empress

I'm guessing you did a great deal of "research" on Carrie Underwoods pictures in order to write this diatribe, Dave.

2/8/2009 3:37:28 PM

#887442
Mr Blur

This guy has gone way beyond self-parody. He needs help, and not from The Babble.

2/8/2009 3:40:00 PM

#887452
Average Guy

DJ Stewart needs a fresh sense of reasoning. And a fresh sense of webpage design. Just look at his site's front page!

2/8/2009 3:42:58 PM

#887517
toth

Where might one find these "immodest photos"? You know, so that I can...avoid them.

2/8/2009 4:07:30 PM

#887535
BufferickVonHellbags


2/8/2009 4:16:45 PM

#887544
Belquer

BufferickVonHellbags wins

/thread

2/8/2009 4:19:33 PM

#887611
El Guapo

Reading DJS' description was more exiting than the photos themselves. He should write for Penthouse letters.

2/8/2009 4:36:28 PM

#887652
enna

Lmao b00bies are only a big deal if you've never got to touch one.

2/8/2009 4:47:54 PM

#888025
?!?!

I thought lack of clothes = innocence; and more clothes = shamefaced sinfullness.

2/8/2009 6:40:06 PM

#888129
QT

OH NOSE! NOT PANTS!

2/8/2009 7:13:19 PM

#888258
IanC

Ah, haven't seen a David quote for a while. Always good for a giggle.

2/8/2009 8:01:46 PM

#888269
atrasicarius

We should make this guy go on /b/ some time to see if his head explodes.

2/8/2009 8:06:56 PM
1 2