HUH? This is a knee-slapper in its idiocy. It is, of course, about evolution and an article about birds.

(1) I dont see how nine transition forms is plenty of evidence...seems like their should be more transition forms than either dinosaurs or birds. Also, from what I understand Archaeopteryx was a fake. (2) Birdlike eggs doesn't imply anything more than they were birdlike eggs (3) Says that male dinosaurs guarded eggs, yet they offer no evidence outside of an artists rendition. Even if it were the case, it makes a very weak argument for the link between birds. Male aligators protect nests within their territory, doesnt make them birds. (4) Tissue in a T-rex...instead of proving that they evolved into birds, this is clear proof that dinosaurs are not 68 million years old or older, but rather proves a recent flood. (5) Again, they suggest that it was a common feature, but give no evidence..because there is none. (6) The bigger question this raises would be, if they had air pockets in their bones, how did they not break under their weight? If it was found only in small bird sized reptiles it again shows nothing other than similar design. (7) At the risk of being redundant, only shows similar design not progressive evolution. (8) Will wait to see further evidence of this, but it only proves that some raptors had feathers at most. (9) And back to the possibly forged fossil archaeopteryx, which there are only a handfull of in the world...again, if dinosaurs did evlove into birds why arent there more transitional forms? And why do the scientists need to pick and choose traits from different dinosaurs? Shouldnt there be a clear progression? There isnt a clear progression, only evidence of similar traits among different species of animals. Seems evolutionists are trying harder and harder these days to push their religion on us.