[This guy is a chess champion, Ph.D chemist and one of the leading voices for Creationism]
The gay activists have oppressive power in Britain. We show tolerance to ‘gays’ and get tyranny in return by Peter Hitchen, about how the Homonazi Gedankenpolizei force approval of homosexual behaviour, and even took children away from loving grandparents to give to a gay "couple" to adopt. I also documented how a bishop was fined for refusing to hire a practising homosexual. The BBC execs also admitted a pro-gay and christophobic bias.
59 comments
"The gay activists have oppressive power in Britain"
No they don't. That's a bare faced lie.
Edit: And quoting that right wing bigot Peter Hitchins in the Daily Fail, gives no weight to your argument. It only shows you to be the fundie homophobe you are.
Jonathan
I see you are an educated man and a bounder. A quacksaviour, making up and spewing crap for the credulous.
You credentials are impeccable - just another xian lying for Jeebus.
-_- there are many others with PhD's that would disagree with that guy, what people don't understand though is knowledge, values and beliefs are all separate, some may come to conclusions on what they should believe using knowledge, but knowledge does not directly dictate 100% of the time what a person choses to believe.
I at least hope when I get a PhD people won't expect me to become atheist -_- that would just be annoying.
"The gay activists have oppressive power in Britain."
Fortunately for us, you are immune to their "Gay Rays". Save us Dr. Sarfati! We're being oppressed!
Grades don't measure everything.
"The gay activists have oppressive power in Britain."
If you don't like it, move to Saudi Arabia where gay activists don't have oppressive power.
He's got "Dr." and "Ph.D." in there, so he can probably spell right, which this post demonstrates for most part. (Then again, I'm not a doctor and I know what "Gedankenpolizei" refers to.) How refreshing. As for the rest... [Citation needed], or at least some enlightening extended discussion and data to back it up.
You show tolerance?
I think the shoe is on the other foot. People put up with assholes like you.
Gays have rights under law. And even these rights are sometimes infringed, although this entails breaking the law.
I note how you are using the language of hate. Surely that's illegal in Britain? So you probably are already breaking the anti-hate legislation that most European states have in place.
As to Christophobia, how can one hate someone who is only puported to have lived?
@Cassandra, Gedankenpolizei means "thought police". Not sure if it's an official borrowed term from German -- like Zeitgeist or Schadenfreude -- but it is definitely German.
Personally, I think the phrase "homonazi gedankenpolizei" almost sounds like a new species of ... I don't know what. :)
Hi Dicks here. Cox is very tyrannical and I am very submissive, usually on Wednesdays and Sundays. However, on Mondays and Thursdays, usually, it is the other way round, I am very tyrannical and Cox is very submissive. But enough of us and our fun and games. I've got to present todays bible quotes. So, without further ado, here they are:-
Mt.1:3-7
3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;
4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;
5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;
6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;
7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;
Ah! Men (and women)
We will return, love Dicks.
The rest of it has been suitably rebutted, but I just have to say this: I'm certain that no media executive, even in Britain, actually "admitted a...christophobic bias."
Also, I'd like him to try playing chess against my wife, who is not only really brilliant at chess herself, but lesbian and capable of being mean as hell.
No, we have respect & tolerance in this country. Healthy British attitudes. Attitudes like yours were exactly the sort that good people in the Allied forces fought & died in WWII to eliminate. The fact you have those attitudes makes you an insult to their memory, so what makes you (& your ilk) think you have the right to live in our free country? Besides, one section of people condemned (by those who thought like you) to die in the Nazi concentration camps were homosexuals. You've got room to talk.
image
Your move, Lelouch.
ZOMG! Teh eebilness of teh gayz.
The double irony of this is that Peter Hitchen, who Dr Dunce PhD seems to think is forcing tyranny upon him, is a right wing, creotard bigoted, any-gay, theistic nutjob.
Everything about this just seems to be making shit up for Jesus.
To someone like me (world's richest man, greatest white lover, first man to walk on the moon, Nobel prize winner, inventor of punctuation and the man who thwarted the Grinch's attepts to steal Christmas), your credentials aren't too impressive. Maybe if they were real...
Strawman, failed Godwin, homophobia, etc, etc. I would expect far more from a supposed "Doctor"
"Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D"
Anyone who gives their name as Dr...Phd" has to be some sort of arsehole.
Peter Hitchens, lol,
"took children away from loving grandparents to give to a gay "couple" to adopt"
Theres a long story behind this one. It boils down to the grandparents being fine with the couple fostering, but not adapting. They grandparents wernt allowed because either A: they were too old or B: their daughter was a drug addict, and us such it wasn't considered safe to keep her children near her.
The fact that the couple was gay means fuck all.
Oh and as long as BBC keep showing Songs of Praise then they wont be "christophobic"
[This guy is a chess champion, Ph.D chemist and one of the leading voices for Creationism]
And yet he's a complete and utter buffoon.
Man, just sling those Ph.D's around why dont you. Its almost like theres no such thing as a Christian whos educated..opps, Im sorry..I understand now.
Not too many super fundamentalists who have that level of degree. I bet the other fundies sucks his dick so hard that his ass cheeks cave in..."A fundy Cretin with a REAL degree!!!! I think my asshole just came a little.!!!"
"...are those supposed to be kings? In that position? I think the animators could have done a bit more research there... "
A king must be lead from the front. Otherwise no one would follow him.
And I have another quote in the public admin where this guy bitches at a 15 year old about how they couldn't find one hole in his argument. a devout christian 15 year old who tried heroically not to offend him or act like they knew everything and to treat him with jesuslike tolerance and forgiveness.
Oh, goddess. *facepalm* Mitch, honey, you're making the rest of us 20 somethings look bad. No one will make you become an atheist. Ever.
@Chi,
I meant the general community would EXPECT me to. It's doubtful they could make me, even though RD.net atheists will generally try deconversion, even though technically there is no need to deconvert a deist from anything other than a mere belief in God, yet completely undogmatic in belief.
What has age got to do with this?
@Orion,
I actually changed it to show optimism, I have faith that I'm meant to get that far. Of course most on this site might consider my faith misplaced, but nonetheless, doesn't stop me from heading that way.
This proves it. You do not need intelligence to get a Ph.D.
I have been suspecting that, with some of the Ph.D idiots around me, but this definitely proves it.
You can almost see him typing his comment, can't you - eyes wide, froth spluttering from his lips, face reddened by his dangerously elevated blood-pressure, banging at the keys so hard you can hear it next-door. Funny, funny stuff.
Safarti's PhD is in physical chemistry - infrared spectroscopy, no less - which makes him an acknowledged expert on that particular subject, or at least it did when his doctorate was granted in 1995. Anything else he comments on is merely opinion.
You can read a fantastic article about Jon-Jon here:
http://unbelief.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/jonathan_sarfati_scientist.pdf
Anyone care to make a wager that Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D will be caught in a sex den, dressed as a schoolboy, having his backside beaten by an 18yr old rentboy?
@Professor M
Re. that screenie from the anime "Code Geass R2", I think White was using his king in the context of 'Greater Threat'. His king was merely potentially threatened by Black's pawn. But the black king was threatened by the use of White Bishops/Queen on those diagonals. So whilst White was putting himself in threat (check), by the fact Black's king was under greater threat by those diagonal-moving White pieces (bishops/Queen), Black was subject to greater threat, using his King was the icing on the cake & thus Checkmate. (I think, in that context, it is permissable to use your King to put the opponent's King in checkmate)
Thus my use of such in my post to show how Jonathan had trapped himself in relation to his statement.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.