Ferengi #fundie amazon.com

- If the laws of chemistry PREVENT the formation of organic molecules due to the chemical composition of the early earth atmosphere as oxydizing, then how is Darwinian-macro-evolution even acceptable as a scientific theory?
- If macro-evolution VIOLATES the very laws of nature itself, is it not contradictory and therefore false, scientifically as well as logically?
- The evidence tells us that chemical evolution is not possible, but complex intelligent life abounds. How is this NOT a violation of natural law?
- As a violation of natural law, is this not a super natural event by definition?
- The evidence presented establishes that chemical evolution is not possible, therefore shouldn't Darwinian-macro-evolution be discarded as scientific theory because it's assumptions have been verified as empirically and scientifically false?
- What is the only other competing model for the origin of life?
- Shouldn't Special Creation be given due consideration since it is the model that best matches the evidence?

55 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.