1
#20403
Papabear
Well, we keep offering God opportunities to take IQ tests, but he never shows up.
3/10/2006 5:25:00 PM
#20410
David D.G.
Hey, scientists just speak for their observations and theories. Guys like Rom831 claim to speak for God; so who really has a problem with hubris here?
~David D.G.
3/10/2006 5:50:32 PM
#1245312
Quantum Mechanic
So when did your imaginary friend take an IQ test?
1/14/2011 2:57:02 PM
#1245316
Anon
Rom831, by the way, what is YOUR IQ score? Just asking...
And when this guy called "God" has a different opinion about supernovae, then I'm completely open to listen to him. I'm really asking for it. To have a scientific discussion with the most intelligent being must be incredible. And I said that I will listen to HIM, NOT to YOU, because YOU are not god, okay?
1/14/2011 3:40:55 PM
#1245322
jas43
so your religious beliefs trump all knowledge?
lol
FUCKING FAIL
1/14/2011 4:06:52 PM
#1245325
anti-nonsense
I don't claim to know better then god does, because god does not exist. Prove he exists, then we'll talk.
1/14/2011 4:31:59 PM
#1245451
Justanotheratheist
God's IQ = 0. The average Rupture Retard's is only slightly higher.
You do understand the fallacy in your "reasoning", don't you? It's based on the premise that god exists. If there was the slightest shred of evidence that he does exist and that he created everything, well sure, then nobody would dare to suggest they're smarter than him. But considering that the evidence is wholly non-existent, the rational amongst us will carry on finding other ways to explain supernovae and everything else.
1/15/2011 1:35:04 AM
#1245457
Swede
God has to submit to an IQ test first. And, by the way, IQ has very little to do with WHAT you know, it's all about HOW you use your brain. If you use it at all, that is.
So, what does God say about supernovae?
We know why you people don't listen; you are willfully ignorant and will keep as far away from knowledge as you can.
1/15/2011 1:48:36 AM
#1245459
Professor M
Even an existent god wouldn't have an IQ -- you can't have a score on a test without taking the test, and IQ isn't actually a measure of any single trait.
@ Swede --
And, by the way, IQ has very little to do with WHAT you know, it's all about HOW you use your brain.
IQ tests are quite aggressively biased in terms of race, class, culture, and cognitive style. And despite attempts to the contrary, it still relies on a very specific set of expected knowledge-based competencies. (In a rather ironic twist, having too much knowledge or skill in some sections can lead to a reduced score -- it varies from test to test, but anything socially- or humanities-based tends to grade performance based on comparisons to a general-competence level and will thus mark down anyone who has specific competence in those fields.)
1/15/2011 2:13:35 AM
#1245461
darkevilme.
Do we believe we know better than your god? No that's silly, comparing knowledge with fictional characters is a daft exercise.
Now you on the other hand, yes we know better than you cause you're an ignorant fundie.
1/15/2011 2:26:31 AM
#1334401
Please produce God's IQ, along with test date.
9/21/2011 2:14:59 AM
#1334402
I claim to know better than Albus Dumbledore also, as he doesn't exist either.
9/21/2011 2:21:36 AM
#1334408
Darkevilme
Actually this is the joy of atheism. We don't believe we know better than him cause we believe that he
DOES NOT EXIST.
9/21/2011 3:30:02 AM
1