Evolution teaches that say a rose will eventually evolve into a fig tree. This is the fundemental teaching of Darwin. But if God made a rose then it will forever bud as a rose, for its gene base cannot change. It has been set like this, likewise a fig tree.
So evolution is a complete useless hypothesis.
69 comments
Well no... A rose becoming a fig tree would actually not be evolution...
In fact, if you could prove that a rose evolved into a fig tree, it would be evidence AGAINST evolution...
Evolution teaches that a species will adapt to a new surroundings and over time those changes can become so vast that the current species will look nothing like it's ancestor.
The evolution you are arguing against doesn't exist.
Actually, it's Dr Dino, not Darwin, who 'teaches' that one thing will 'evolve' into another.
Dr Dino knows as much as he does because he diligently studied the Saturday morning cartoons.
Okay, I have a new definition for "not gonna happen".
"when Fundies read something other than Bible".
I would have added a SCIENCE FAIL, but it would have been a cheap shot.
"Evolution teaches that say a rose will eventually evolve into a fig tree."
Windows has encountered a problem and needs to close. Interface between keyboard and chair too stupid to operate computer.
"This is the fundemental teaching of Darwin."
You have obviously mistaken Darwin for that guy who shoves rose hips up his nose and recites poetry about figs.
"But if God made a rose then it will forever bud as a rose, for its gene base cannot change. It has been set like this, likewise a fig tree."
Was that rose yellow, white, pink, or red?
So evolution is a complete useless hypothesis.
Error: Unresolved IF Please Debug.
I'm pretty sure you don't understand what the following words mean: evolution, teaches, fundamental, Darwin, gene, hypothesis
Centuries of cultivation of roses has produced many varieties than produce only sterile hybrids when crossed, this was known as far back as 1924.
And what do we call it when descendant forms of a single ancestor species are no longer able to produce viable offspring with each other?
WTF? Does he think Evolution is from Pokemon?
I'd call him a retard, but I think even the mentally challenged would take offense to this sort of idiocy!
"Evolution teaches that say a rose will eventually evolve into a fig tree. This is the fundemental teaching of Darwin."
No, it isn't. If a rose "evolved" into a fig tree that would be magic. Likewise, no one, other than creationists, has ever made any prediction based on the Theory of Evolution that a cat will give birth to a dog or a canary a walrus. It just doesn't happen that way (hint: populations evolve) and your ignorance is shocking. You have at your fingertips one of the greatest research tools ever invented, try using it! But first you have to open your mind...
" Evolution teaches that say a rose will eventually evolve into a fig tree"
Figs are an abomination before God. Its in the Bible.
I suspect a modern rose and fig are on different branches of the tree and you would have to go quite far back to find a common ancestor to both.
Genes change all the time.
No, it most definitely doesn't teach that. The rose species is evolving into a rose-like flower that will fit its niche even better than it does today.
Darwin has no "fundemental" teaching, as he is dead.
If God made a flu virus it will forever be the same flu virus, as its gene base cannot change. But, as we need new flu vaccines almost every year, we can see for ourselves that this is not so.
Quantum Mechanic: "How do people this stupid find food?"
We've made it too damned easy, that's how. Morons like this wouldn't last two seconds in the wild.
'Evolution teaches that say a rose will eventually evolve into a fig tree. '
And the bible teaches the earth was created when the sky pixie passed a kidney stone. So the sky pixie is a useless hypothesis.
See, I can make up crap, too.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
