1 2 3 4
#917135
COVIZAPIBETEFOKY
I didn't know atheism required worship!
2/27/2009 11:02:55 PM
#917136
Efrain
Who?
2/27/2009 11:03:08 PM
#917137
RavenWood
What?
2/27/2009 11:04:22 PM
#917139
Bass X
Why?
2/27/2009 11:05:46 PM
#917140
Efrain
When?
2/27/2009 11:05:47 PM
#917141
Psittacosis
Earthworms. Barnacles. And do tell us what scientific training Newton had.
Whither?
2/27/2009 11:06:09 PM
#917142
Efrain
Thanks a lot Psittacosis! D:<
2/27/2009 11:06:38 PM
#917144
Carpworld
cccccccombo breaker!
2/27/2009 11:08:08 PM
#917145
Mitch
More L. Ron Hubbardthan Kent Hovind? I think not!
2/27/2009 11:08:18 PM
#917147
Illuminatalie
Oh dear God you people are delusional. The only people that care THAT much about Darwin are you obsessed lunatics (just like the only people that care THAT much about gay sex are you obsessed lunatics). This is becoming more common - since the anti-reality madmen have given up trying to refute evolution with facts, they start gossiping about Darwin's personal life. He was a card-carrying member of the Stonecutters, he married his aunt, his bloodlines trace back to the powerful Teutonic Knights, his uncle gave blowjobs to Nietzsche, they had strange ceremonies on the night he was born, etc etc.
2/27/2009 11:10:55 PM
#917148
Marc
Damnit, even though the rest of you spoiled it, I'll say, "How?"
2/27/2009 11:11:44 PM
#917149
surfinseaotter
wtf?
2/27/2009 11:15:39 PM
#917152
The Jamo
What the fuck is with this constant need to worship everybody? Nobody "worships" scientists, you moron. Also, being an academic failure [if at all] has nothing to do with being a good scientist. Science is the search for knowledge. There is no pre-requisite in terms of training to prepare you for it. You are either inquisitive or you're not. Now shut the fuck up.
2/27/2009 11:17:21 PM
#917153
If you mean Charles Darwin. I don't really give shit about him.
2/27/2009 11:18:22 PM
#917155
On and on anon
Listen, ToGodBeTheGlory. I have never met you and you will likely never read this. But I can deduce from your statements - so vacous and ignorant that they, frankly, boggle the mind - that you are a pox on the face of humanity. And if it's a choice between eternity in heaven with you, or eternity in the intimate company of Satan's red hot poker; I'm siding with Beelzebub.
I will never understand why you - and others of your ilk - must insist on poisoning my - and others' - brain(s) with your vile opinions and dragging us all down into the paranoia inducing, herd-mentality effecting pit you inhabit.
Thank you, and goodnight.
2/27/2009 11:20:47 PM
#917157
Old Viking
All Darwin did was establish one of the most vital and productive scientific theories of all time, upon which all modern biology is based. ToGodBeTheGlory, on the other hand, is noted for ... wait, I'm sure it will come to me.
2/27/2009 11:23:07 PM
#917160
NotThere
There's no worship involved, dumbass, and even if you were correct about Darwin, that would not reflect at all on whether or not evolution or natural selection take place (they do!).
2/27/2009 11:24:04 PM
#917163
Grigadil
Scientists don't need heros.
Besides, so what?
2/27/2009 11:26:25 PM
#917168
fundiesRtehlulz
You can slander Darwin all you want. Even if it was discovered that he was a baby raper, it would have no bearing on the evidence for evolution.
2/27/2009 11:31:03 PM
#917173
POSW
Poor fundie, he thinks science is like politics, where you can just dig up or make up shit about the opposition and you'll win.
2/27/2009 11:35:50 PM
#917175
TauRaven
You sound more like Kent Hovind than a rational human being.
2/27/2009 11:40:26 PM
#917177
GigaGuess
@Illuminatalie
Don't forget that he recanted everything on his deathbed.
2/27/2009 11:41:16 PM
#917183
Panz
Kinda funny how it's ok to make fun of credited scientists with them, but don't you dare mock their church leaders
2/27/2009 11:44:42 PM
#917195
Bob of QF
If you are speaking of Darwin, you're sadly deluded.
For science, unlike religion, does not require the person who *discovers* scientific information to even be a nice person.
All it requires is facts.
Facts to prove the scientific discovery.
Darwin *discovered* the *fact* of evolution of life on earth.
If he had not discovered it, someone else would have: that is the way of discoveries. They are facts waiting for someone to stumble over them.
Contrast this with religion: it's based entirely on belief. Thus, the messenger is sacrosanct. If the messenger is unworthy, then the message is useless.
No one needs to even *respect* Charles Darwin, let alone "worship" him.
Only a religious fool would think otherwise.
2/27/2009 11:55:38 PM
#917198
Osiris
The Evo-atheists can’t stand the FACT that their big hero was a nobody who was an academic failure.
Yeah he was. So what?
Okay look here's the thing. If Darwin was so out of his leauge, if he was so over his head and his ideas were so silly and ridiculous, why wasn't he laughed out of the scientific community? Why have his ideas became the corner stone of modern biology?
The ones who can't stand the facts are you.
2/27/2009 11:59:06 PM
1 2 3 4