1 2 3
#928258
Canadia
*Yawn* same old rehashed stupidity...
3/24/2009 8:30:51 PM
#928259
Valohir
There are no prohibitions against sex with multiple partners you prudish morans, nor should there be. The only prohibited sex should be between non consenting partners like pedophilia or bestiality.
3/24/2009 8:33:03 PM
#928261
wackadoodle
So why do the mormons spend so much time and money fighting them? *rimshot*
3/24/2009 8:36:07 PM
#928263
Charni
ugh....
ugh ugh ugh
please, for the love of your God, GTFO
3/24/2009 8:39:29 PM
#928268
"Their ultimate goal is to abolish all prohibitions against sex with multiple partners."
What prohibitions against sex with multiple partners?
3/24/2009 9:04:48 PM
#928285
Since someone has to say it...
[citation fucking needed]
3/24/2009 9:50:03 PM
#928286
werewolf
Larger sexual agenda? Sounds dirty. Are we talking length or circumference?
3/24/2009 9:50:37 PM
#928294
Mrs. Antichrist
Making shit up doesn't make it true.
3/24/2009 9:56:10 PM
#928302
ausador
Watcha talkin bout Willis?
What prohibitions? You can already have as many consenting adults under one roof as you want, as long as no one is married to more than one person it is legal.
So there is this big conspiracy to make something legal that already is legal? You might want to brush up on your logic skills a little there...
3/24/2009 10:10:25 PM
#928309
OH NO! It's a cunning plan to make sex with multiple partners acceptable! We can't let that happen, or...
um...
All right, now I'm sort of lost here.
3/24/2009 10:28:42 PM
#928316
Rat of Steel
A lifestyle including group sex is called Swinging.
Polyamory, as the word implies (which you'd know if you ever truly bothered to look it up), deals with multiple partners in love, not sex. It's entirely possible to be one or the other, or to be both (as I am).
3/24/2009 10:42:51 PM
#928318
Eden
What does monogamous gay marriage have to do with sex with multiple partners?
3/24/2009 10:44:38 PM
#928331
Tearlich
@wackadoodle:So why do the mormons spend so much time and money fighting them? *rimshot*
No rim, pure net!
3/24/2009 11:32:48 PM
#928333
Tearlich
How about King David and his father?
3/24/2009 11:38:31 PM
#928338
Brain_In_A_Jar
Are you suggesting that you actually would be prepared to give homosexuals the right to marry, if only they actually meant what they are saying and you obviously don't believe? If you wouldn't (Bets, anyone?) then the rest of your "argument" is redundant.
3/24/2009 11:50:24 PM
#928344
Geno
Wait.. so homosexuals want legal rights bestowed to long-term monogamous relationships.. so that they can have multiple partners later, after being married? And break prohibitions that aren't there? Who told you this? Methinks the lot of you thought it up while high or drunk out of your gourd. Do some damn research before being bigots, you gits.
3/25/2009 12:04:57 AM
#928346
aaa
Huh?
3/25/2009 12:12:08 AM
#928347
Mihangel apYrs
no we're not.
We want the same legal advantages that hetersexuals have through marriage; afterall the govt (in the UK and prob in the US) recognises unmarried gay relationships in order to reduce social security benefits.
I've heard none of my gay friends or the gay press pushing for polygamy as a legal option - the muslim and mormon fundies are likely to be pressing for that!!
fail Fail FAIL!!!
3/25/2009 12:13:16 AM
#928360
Paschal Wagner
They are finally admitting what the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) has been saying for years
Apparently, if you make a ridiculous claim enough times, it automatically becomes true.
Just like religion, in other words.
3/25/2009 1:25:14 AM
#928364
Xotan
Homosexual activists are now beginning to openly admit that they don't want to marry just to have a normal home life.
+++ This is perfectly true. This is why I have spent the last 36 years of my life living with the same man in a monogamous relationship - just so I could wait until this moment to prove your point.
You are a lying mischiefmaker... unless you can produce cast-iron citations for your assertion, showing it is not a wild generalisation. Also, you need to look at/comment on divorce for heterosexual relationships too, or you are a hypocrite.
3/25/2009 2:07:24 AM
#928373
LDM
"Homosexuals claim they want the "right" to get married and live normal lives just like heterosexual married couples. "
That's all all they gays I know want.
"The truth is, however, that the drive to gain legalization of so-called "gay" or "same-sex" marriage is part of a larger sexual agenda."
No it's not
"Homosexual activists are now beginning to openly admit that they don't want to marry just to have a normal home life."
All the ones I know do.
"They want same-sex marriage as a way of destroying the concept of marriage altogether-and of introducing polygamy and polyamory (group sex) as "families.""
You mean like those Mormon fundies?
"They are finally admitting what the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) has been saying for years: Their ultimate goal is to abolish all prohibitions against sex with multiple partners. "
You say that like it's a bad thing.
3/25/2009 2:34:33 AM
#928381
Thammuz
As if there ever were any prohibitions if the whole thing was consensual. You people sound an awful lot like some sort of sexual gestapo.
3/25/2009 2:53:26 AM
#928387
EvoPagan
I'm afraid you're going to have to show me where the Homosexual Activists actually said this, or STFU.
3/25/2009 3:08:46 AM
#928391
Captain Britannica
Whenever a fundie says that "they" are "finally admitting" something, it is always, always, a lie. As in:
Liberals are finally admitting they hate America:
Scientists are finally admitting there is no evidence for evolution;
Atheists are finally admitting they don't believe in God.
OK, that last one is actually true.
3/25/2009 3:15:31 AM
#928398
The Lazy One
There is so much fail in this quote that I don't know where to start, so I'll just do this. Monogamous homosexual relationship != polygamy.
3/25/2009 3:28:20 AM
1 2 3