1
#299924
And straight couples have STDs and AIDS too.
10/3/2007 8:09:46 AM
#299934
Homer
Firstly, risk classification by life assurance companies means that somebody else's risk will not affect your premiums in any way.
Secondly, the right to insure your life doesn't require you to be married in the first place. Life offices don't turn away unmarried people- why would they?
10/3/2007 8:23:35 AM
#299935
Homer
Firstly, risk classification by life assurance companies means that somebody else's risk will not affect your premiums in any way.
Secondly, the right to insure your life doesn't require you to be married in the first place. Life offices don't turn away unmarried people- why would they?
10/3/2007 8:23:43 AM
#300046
GigaGuess
So...we're going to start doing health checks prior to marriage? People at risk for heart problems can't get married? People with drug problems? Drinkers? Gamblers? The obese? Anorexic? I could go on all day.
10/3/2007 10:41:27 AM
#300091
Freboy
Uhm, gays and all other people who are married are generally less promiscuous, so that takes care of the STDs.
10/3/2007 11:43:55 AM
#300095
szena
Letting gays marry makes them more likely to get STDs than not letting them marry?
WTF?
10/3/2007 11:48:38 AM
#589262
Everybody knows AIDS spontaneously generates inside gays after marriage. (sarcasm)
7/15/2008 10:06:32 PM
#1256525
I wonder, why not more inssurances in Africa?. Just a thought.
2/14/2011 2:23:14 AM
#1300753
Renon
While I loathe this person, I do have to agree with him on one single point.
As a matter of fact, yes, it would be nice if a gay couple could have health insurance shared between the two, just like straight couples.
6/17/2011 6:47:28 PM
1