That's not what "secular" means, Eisenstein.
10/16/2007 1:04:38 AM
even if he is a moron, you gotta love his attempt to find a loophole
10/16/2007 3:36:48 AM
*to the unreal soundclip*
M-M-M-M-M-MONSTER FAIL FAIL fail fail...
10/16/2007 5:31:03 AM
Because first God wrote a whole bunch of texts, then he changed his mind and threw some away.
10/16/2007 5:35:07 AM
You should get out more.
10/16/2007 8:57:31 AM
Secular =/= apocryphal.
I'm with Didymos here. We got some good first-century apocrypha here that'll knock your socks off.
10/16/2007 9:21:29 AM
"The Dead Sea Scrolls [containing the Old Testament] "
I din' write no OT stuff, dude.
Read my blog.
10/16/2007 9:40:56 AM
Um. No. Sorry.
10/16/2007 10:09:19 AM
The Koran is not a part of the Bible. Can I use it as a secular source?
12/22/2010 2:40:46 AM
No it can't, the Bible is in books because it's the product of seperate scrolls, the DSS are just some of the oldest copies we have found.
And answer why, to this day there isn't a collected tome of the DSS? Because a lot of them were not used in the Bible, some of them are in the Gnostic but all of them have never been compiled and translated.
12/22/2010 6:14:33 AM
Buy a dictionary (I recommend Webster's) and USE IT!
6/30/2012 8:29:30 AM
That's not what "secular" means, idiot.
9/5/2012 3:56:51 PM