And in the desperate attempts to prove the validity of the theory evolutionism has sort of collapsed in upon itself with the weight of evidence against it... I believe that the scientific and academic community now has egg on thier face over this ridiculous theory. They hung all thier hopes upon it being proven, and have basically still not publically given up on finding proof for the theory... The science fiction madness that took control of our science classes and laboratories is finally turning again to what can be proven...
15 comments
...and we in the scientific community welcome the contribution of LaMontre and other Rapture Readies, to the body of knowledge and understanding of nature.
Their hard and tenacious work, which is now at the cover page of many scientific journals, has driven a paradigm shift in global research efforts and answered some of the most profound paradoxes of our time.
[@ LaMontre: If you ever want to see this editorial in Nature magazine, start working. Begin by learning some statistics.]
The following quotes may well have been uttered by LaMont*
“No one will need more than 637 kb of memory for a personal computer. 640K ought to be enough for anybody.”
“Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible.”
“Radio has no future.”
“Well informed people know it is impossible to transmit the voice over wires and that were it possible to do so, the thing would be of no practical value.”
“Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.”
(from http://www.goodquotes.info/worst-predictions-ever-dumb-quotes-on-technology.html )
So, why should we take anything you say serious, when you don't even know how to spell "their"?
Honey, if it wasn't proven, it would not be a theory. A scientific theory is "proven" beyond reasonable doubt and several scientists, who would LOVE to find fault with it, have checked and rechecked and double checked, but haven't been able to find any fault with it. THEN it becomes a theory.
The weight of evidence against it? The weight of nothing, you mean?
You do not understand what "theory" means.
You observe something happening, then come up with an explanation. Not the other way around.
Nobody "hung thier hopes upon it being proven" because that's not how science works. Science reacts to what is happening, attempting to explain it with the available evidence. No more, no less. Evolution fits perfectly with the evidence.
You people say this nonsense, but I don't think you believe it - you can't be so blind. How about you look at the evidence yourself? Go to school, get a degree, and then prove to us that evolution is false. There'll be international repute, fame, money and a Nobel Prize in it for you.
Again, another one for the flock.
There is NO evidence against it and the academic and research people have faced no embarrassing conflicts to the theory.
This weighty evidence, in another room is it ? Are several strong men, even now, struggling to manhandle it up the stairs ? Perhaps the truck carrying it got waylaid by bandits ?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
