Quote# 62330

No, Richard Dawkins does not exist. I have never seen him. Science has given a full and satisfying explanation of the book alleged to be his handiwork. It is but a collection of fortuitously ordered a's, b's and c's, recombined from previous patterns. There is the alphabet, there is a book of nursery rhymes and there is "The God Delusion" - and one developed from the other, though some of the details of which is the most primitive remain to be sorted out. The links between them may still be missing, but Science will have that worked out at any moment. Anyone who doubts this fact is either lying, mad or stupid (or wicked, but I'd rather not think about that possibility).

Having settled the case, I congratulated myself on my acute use of logic and reason. After lunch, I have another pressing question to tackle.

Do I exist?

knight-in-black-leather, IMDB 58 Comments [5/15/2009 11:47:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 37

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 | bottom



5/15/2009 11:49:09 AM


Nice effort, poor execution.

Keep trying, leather, keep trying.

5/15/2009 11:50:36 AM


If this is for real, I'm going to go cry.

5/15/2009 11:51:02 AM

Doctor Whom

Yes, that's it exactly. Books give birth to Chick tracts, which grow up to be the next generation of books, and so forth. In other words, knight-in-black-leather, is your straw man wearing black leather, too?

5/15/2009 11:57:56 AM


Do I exist?

Nope, the text in the OP was written by an untrained monkey!

5/15/2009 12:01:41 PM


You're clever.

Not wise, but clever.

5/15/2009 12:05:07 PM


You fundies do love your little strawmen don't you?

5/15/2009 12:09:46 PM

No. You're not a knight, and you don't wear black leather.

5/15/2009 12:11:41 PM


Seen worse.

5/15/2009 12:12:29 PM



5/15/2009 12:14:05 PM

Swedish Pagan

(In the words of Black Willow from Buffy the Vampire Slayer:) Bored now...

No, you don't exist, I have never seen you. (Ah, too easy.)

5/15/2009 12:19:25 PM

Dio Fa

Have you ever heard the saying, "I think, therefore I am"?

You do not exist.

5/15/2009 12:21:53 PM

Can some sweet, gay leather-wearing Albertan take one for the team and marry KIBL so he can finally have non-fornicating sex and relax?? I think he's losing it and teetering on the edge of de-conversion, for real.

5/15/2009 12:42:00 PM


Books don't reproduce.

5/15/2009 12:50:20 PM


I hope not.

5/15/2009 12:55:37 PM


Dawkins can be seen on video. You can buy an airline ticket and go see him. You can't do that with your imaginary everywhere-but-nowhere god. If can manage to talk without drooling, and ask nicely, Dawkins may autograph a book for you, verbally confirming that he wrote it and even giving you a sample of his handwriting. Go try that with your god. Until you can justify your creation myth by the same standard, STFU.

5/15/2009 1:03:58 PM

Agnostic Antagonist

This one's kind of cute.

5/15/2009 1:28:17 PM

purple onion

"Having settled the case, I congratulated myself on my acute use of logic and reason."

Just give yourself a big ol' pat on the back for your massive failure at logic.

"Do I exist?"

I wish it were true that you didn't.
just a figure of my imagination sent from my self-hating region of the brain to make me crazy.

5/15/2009 1:32:20 PM

If you think that makes sense, doesn't it make our point of view make EVEN MORE sense?

5/15/2009 1:36:18 PM


Where your analogy fails hard, aside from the fact that there are many, many ways of verifying that Dawkins exists, is that, unlike God and Jebus, you don't need to rewrite the laws of physics in order for it to be possible for Dawkins to exist.

5/15/2009 1:38:52 PM


No, if you existed, I would have seen you, and I think I would remember something so painful as encountering someone as stupid as yourself.

5/15/2009 1:47:38 PM


Sarcasm? oh my, don't attempt it or your head might explode XD....

Nice try though, completly wrong, but nice try xD

5/15/2009 1:54:06 PM


.- Accidental double post -.

5/15/2009 1:56:22 PM


Nobody doubts that the bronze age Arab goat-herders who wrote the Bible existed.

5/15/2009 2:15:18 PM

Mrs. Antichrist

The difference being that there is evidence that Dawkins exists, beyond the claims of a book.

As for whether you exist, remember: Cogito ergo sum.

5/15/2009 2:45:55 PM

1 2 3 | top: comments page