Quote# 64256

Deep down, every modern progressive completely agrees with [Margaret] Sanger. She was the link between Darwin and Hitler. But since eugenics got a bad name after the Nazis, our modern-day progressives have had to peddle the many faces of eugenics with terms like 'liberating' birth control, abortion 'rights', 'merciful' euthanasia, etc, so as not to reveal their true eugenic goals. Yes, eugenics is still espoused, but in euphemisms like 'planned parenthood', that sound wonderfully benign and compassionate.

Gotta save the world from the social ills of poverty, disease, mental infirmity, low IQs... so they'll eliminate hordes of 'unfit', 'unwanted' and irrelevant lives to achieve the goal of heaven on earth. No danger there -- progress at its best.

lvb-rocks, Moonbattery 40 Comments [7/30/2009 9:27:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 44
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom


Moonshittery, that is.

7/30/2009 9:55:06 PM


Or Asshattery.

Or Batshittery.

7/30/2009 9:56:04 PM


Planned Parenthood and birth control were created to give women an option in their pregnancy. It's not some global conspiracy to reintroduce eugenics.

7/30/2009 10:05:01 PM


damn double posts, they just make me feel stupid

7/30/2009 10:05:08 PM


That's a pretty slippery slope you've got there, be careful so you dont fall on your ass. Woops, too late.

7/30/2009 10:34:42 PM


Gotta save the world from the social ills of poverty, disease, mental infirmity, low IQs... so they'll eliminate hordes of 'unfit', 'unwanted' and irrelevant lives to achieve the goal of heaven on earth.

...or we could just give them all to the 456 next time they come a-calling? *shrug*

Also, as someone who had to euthanize her cancer-stricken and horribly suffering cat last weekend, please accept a hearty FUCK YOU from me as you deny that such a technique could be rooted in mercy.

7/30/2009 11:01:19 PM


I feel sick after reading this. What's wrong with you, people? Leave Margaret Sanger, Darwin and bad H-man alone! /almost Godwined

Alternative post:

Which one doesn't belong:

1)Margaret Sanger
2)Adolf Hitler
3)Charles Darwin

7/30/2009 11:17:34 PM

"they'll eliminate hordes of 'unfit', 'unwanted' and irrelevant lives"

Obviously, the "modern-day progressives" failed to identify and eliminate you.

7/30/2009 11:34:43 PM

b. beau brinker

Gulping down George Grant's koolaid by the gallon, eh? Grant is to Sanger what Leo Taxil was to the Freemasons, what Peter LaBarbera is to gays... and what the bible is to science...

7/30/2009 11:46:43 PM

Just how are Nazis progressive?

7/30/2009 11:52:01 PM


So, wait, Sanger was the one who burned Darwin's books for Hitler? I knew she was involved somewhere! Thank you!

7/30/2009 11:52:55 PM

Pule Thamex

Who wants to mate with a drooling moron? Only another drooling moron? Progress has got fuck all to do with it, unless sexual attraction can be seen as a facet of progress in action. Which perhaps it can.

Who doesn't want to save the world from poverty and disease? Only a drooling moron. Mental infirmity can strike anyone at any time, I would have thought. Low IQ's? Well, I guess some people have a low IQ but so what?

7/30/2009 11:52:56 PM

"[Margaret] Sanger. She was the link between Darwin and Hitler."


7/31/2009 12:07:15 AM



7/31/2009 12:19:19 AM

7/31/2009 12:43:16 AM


If that were the case, people like you would have been killed long ago. Moron.

7/31/2009 12:45:55 AM

None of those things are eugenics, you moron. There's not even any actual goals to those things.

Also, what's wrong with eliminating disease?

7/31/2009 1:40:16 AM


Your feeble-minded understanding of the Origin and your hatred for women does not an argument make.

7/31/2009 2:56:36 AM


Sure, because abortion is planned on a strictly genetic basis

7/31/2009 3:25:49 AM


"Deep down, every modern progressive completely agrees with [Margaret] Sanger."

I don't actually know who that is. I'm going to assume she's American and as such you assume that everybody would know her.

7/31/2009 4:04:55 AM

Swedish Pagan

In what way was Hitler progressive? Eugenics kept on for quite some time, forced sterilizations of slow-witted was done when I was young, it ended the same year I began school, in 1976, here in Sweden.

What's eugenics got to do with planned parenthood? Having two children instead of eight is not eugenics, the genes are still being carried on to the next generation. Waiting to have children until you can take care of them in the way they deserve is not eugenics either. The genes will carry on here too.

Ms Sanger did have some things that I agree with, but the widespread racism of those days I can not agree with. But those were not HER ideas, that was just how society was back then, everyone thought so, more or less. Society has progressed quite a lot since then.

7/31/2009 4:17:55 AM

Table Rock

How does euthanasia factor into eugenics? Forgive my bluntness but typically people who want euthanasia are in no condition to procreate anymore. They are out of the gene pool regardless.

7/31/2009 5:47:09 AM

You need to be fucked up the ass with a history book.

7/31/2009 5:53:19 AM


You didn't perhaps even think to as "modern progressives" what their motivation is, did you? I don't suppose it matters; you'd just claim it to be all lies anyway. And how, exactly, is contraception about eugenics at all?

7/31/2009 7:10:10 AM


Hey, Margaret Sanger *did* say black people are weeds...

If that's not eugenics then I don't know what is.

7/31/2009 7:27:03 AM

1 2 | top: comments page