1 2 3
#997807
anonymous
That's some logic fail right there.
7/31/2009 3:34:53 PM
#997808
Doctor Whom
Something has to exist before it can be denied. I deny the existence of leprechauns. Oh, wait a minute ....
7/31/2009 3:35:37 PM
#997824
I deny the existence of their being hundreds of hot babes in my room. Seriously, I do not believe they are in here. None of them are!
7/31/2009 3:43:51 PM
#997825
Wehpudicabok
"Something has to exist before it can be denied."
By this logic, it's impossible to truthfully say that ANYTHING does not exist. Your denial of the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster only proves that He exists!
7/31/2009 3:45:38 PM
#997835
ME
"Something has to exist before it can be denied."
So then santa, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny, Zeuss, Thor, Isis, etc.., etc.. nust exist, because I am sure you deny them. .... This is what we call LOGIC FAIL.
7/31/2009 3:48:19 PM
#997842
Old Viking
Brinkley has been nominated for Fundy Logician of the Year.
7/31/2009 3:50:12 PM
#997861
RavenWood
Atheism does not work that way.
7/31/2009 3:56:27 PM
#997887
EvoPagan
Deny my invisible albino ninja wolf/cat hybrid. Prove it exists.
7/31/2009 4:06:04 PM
#997909
"They have all the proof they need, and are just rejecting God."
Wrong.
"Something has to exist before it can be denied."
Wrong.
"Thus the atheist has already heard about God"
Generally, right.
"or he would be ignorant rather than in denial."
Right and then Wrong.
38%. . .
7/31/2009 4:11:50 PM
#997917
Papabear
You wouldn't know proof if it bit you on the butt and was wearing an "I am the proof you seek" sign.
All the "proof" you and your ilk provide is ill-gather, ill-read, ill-understood and heavily dosed with desperate wishful thinking.
You're in no position to accuse others of being in denial. Religion relies upon followers such as you being in denial.
7/31/2009 4:14:10 PM
#997969
WMDKitty
*sigh*
*shakes head*
*walks off*
7/31/2009 4:29:28 PM
#997981
A Friend
Just because we have a concept of something that doesn't make it real. This isn't Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends.
7/31/2009 4:33:08 PM
#997985
BobsOldSocks
"They have all the proof they need, and are just rejecting God."
Where? Where is the evidence of your god? In a book full of errors and lies, written by ignorant men and edited many, many, many times over? Show me the evidence. Point at something, anything, in the real world and explain why it's evidence for the existence of your god.
"Something has to exist before it can be denied."
Bollocks. I deny the existence of invisible pink unicorns and celestial chinaware orbiting the sun; by your "logic" that means they both exist, right?
7/31/2009 4:35:08 PM
#997995
EllwyenDarwin
"They have all the proof they need, and are just rejecting God."
Then by all means show me the proof of Odin's existence and I'll stop rejecting him.
7/31/2009 4:39:59 PM
#998069
Efrain
I deny that I have a harem of hot girls that are willing to submit to even my most sadistically twisted desires.
7/31/2009 5:11:57 PM
#998080
If only you could make things real simply by denying their existence. I can think of plenty of things I'd love to deny the existence of, starting with the TARDIS in my back garden.
And, you know, world peace and an end to poverty and hunger and so on, but I'm denying the TARDIS first, damnit.
7/31/2009 5:21:32 PM
#998090
Headache
7/31/2009 5:31:59 PM
#998096
Caustic Gnostic
We're aware that something you call 'god' exists in your twisted imagination.
We're also aware of dust devils on Mars.
7/31/2009 5:37:24 PM
#998111
Vince
your logic is actually causing me physical pain.
7/31/2009 5:48:04 PM
#998114
Mike Sihl
So that's why they don't deny the existence of dragons, satyrs and unicorns. And I thought it was because they were mentioned in the Bible. Silly me.
7/31/2009 5:49:42 PM
#998120
So... Jesus, therefore unicorns?
7/31/2009 5:56:19 PM
#998140
Daken
So by your logic, there really is a leprechaun at the end of a rainbow! Cool! I am going to go get my knife and go get my pot of gold.
After all, you deny leprechauns, and they have to exist for you to deny them.
7/31/2009 6:14:32 PM
#998160
Hazor
Flying purple space monkeys do not exist.
Therefor, they exist? Not so much.
7/31/2009 6:35:37 PM
#998162
Slayer
Hey, it's Brinkley again. I wonder if he tries so sound so stupid...
7/31/2009 6:37:22 PM
#998179
Horsefeathers
"I do not believe that atheists want proof before believing."
No, not "proof". I just want substantial, empirical, verifiable evidence in favor of your claims. Just like I want for any other outrageous claims people make.
"They have all the proof they need, and are just rejecting God."
I see no evidence of your god or the god(s) of anyone else. If you have some, please provide it.
"Something has to exist before it can be denied."
I emphatically deny that there is a fluffy pink space bunny currently in orbit around Phobos.
Are you now going to tell me that there is a fluffy pink space bunny currently in orbit around Phobos else I could not possibly deny that there is?
"Thus the atheist has already heard about God, or he would be ignorant rather than in denial."
One cannot be "in denial" of something unless they know that something is true (or there is at least a possibility of it being true) and simply refuse to accept it.
Denying the existence of something based on complete and total lack of evidence is much different than denying it exists simply because I know it does but would rather it didn't.
One is healthy skepticism and the other is irrational.
7/31/2009 6:58:52 PM
1 2 3