Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 65081

if evolution was real humans, and animals alike would not need reproductive organs.

James, Yahoo answers 158 Comments [8/25/2009 9:19:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 221
Submitted By: Mithcoriel
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4 5 7
Headache

Thank you for demonstrating your absolute lack of any knowledge about evolution!

Great job!

8/25/2009 9:26:36 AM

Null

There are just no words, I mean, who can be that ignorant?

8/25/2009 9:28:32 AM

NecroVMX

As evolution depends on populations reproducing, I don't see how that conclusion can be drawn.

I think Pokemon has a lot to answer for, as these idiots seem to think evolution means something spontaneously changing into something else, and not populations changing over time to adapt to the enviornment.

8/25/2009 9:30:09 AM

Shadow Panther




....
....
What?

8/25/2009 9:30:15 AM

aaa

Thank you for demonstrating your stupidity.

8/25/2009 9:32:46 AM

Doubting Thomas

OK now you're just trying to be totally stupid. Did you know that evolution depends on animals & humans reproducing?

@NecroVMX:

I agree, I think most evolution deniers believe that evolution means that animals spontaneously change into another species, like a dog changing into a cat. Or, if they don't actually believe it, they use it as a straw man argument as much as possible.

8/25/2009 9:36:12 AM

emau99

I think there's been a slight miscommunication here. Why don't you tell us what you think evolution is?

8/25/2009 9:38:38 AM

Godbuster

Well, no, but that's what the catholic church wishes.

8/25/2009 9:41:28 AM

Efrain

You're partly right, but not for the reason you think. :/

8/25/2009 9:41:45 AM



If thats what I thought evolution was then I wouldn't believe it either.

Thankfully I know better.

8/25/2009 9:41:47 AM

DevilsChaplain

Actually, the reason we have reproductive organs is precisely because of evolution. Reproducing asexually only yields limited genetic variation--sexual reproduction offers much greater genetic variation. See? Yeah, you probably still wouldn't get it, that's why you post on Yahoo Answers......

8/25/2009 9:42:58 AM

Callahan

FAIL!!!

Well, as much as I hate allcaps, that one just needed it.

8/25/2009 9:43:03 AM

EvoPagan

Heh. No.

8/25/2009 9:53:19 AM

John_in_Oz

Pokemon for the Lose.

8/25/2009 9:53:29 AM

Giveitaday

if evolution was real

That is not in any sense a gramtically corect statement. I guess that is to be expected from someone who seems to think that real answers are to be found at Yahoo.

humans, and animals alike would not need reproductive organs

How did you come to such an inane and idiotic conclusion? Evolution requires reproduction and reproduction in higher life forms requires reproductive organs. This is quite possibly the absolute stupidest argument against evolution that I have ever read. Were you dropped on your head often as a child? is that why you are now a blathering idiot?

@ Doubting Thomas

That exactly what many of them believe. i can't count the number of times I heard an evolution denier claim that evolution isn't possible because you don't see cats giving birth to dogs or some such bullshit.

8/25/2009 9:55:28 AM

Morbo the Annihilator

GRAMMAR DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
GOODNIGHT!

8/25/2009 9:55:44 AM

Eden

I have to agree with Devils Chaplain and might add:

Without the genetic variability we have thanks to sexual reproduction, we might have already become extinct... for example because of becoming a victim of one of the many diseases that affect humans.

Maybe next time you visit biology class you should listen to what your teacher says instead of sleeping or playing with your handy, James.
If you are being homeschooled however, bad luck for you, James, but don´t worry, you won´t need to have any knowledge about evolutionary biology in order to become a good burgerflipper ;)

8/25/2009 9:56:30 AM

Imroy

Wow, that is just an amazingly dumb thing to say.

@NecroVMX: I agree. The strawman version of evolution that many creationists attack does seem to work like Pokemon. I don't know if Pokemon is actually to blame, but it is very similar.

8/25/2009 9:58:53 AM

CrazyHappyNinja

Huh...wha...but...


8/25/2009 9:59:50 AM

Xotan

Please explain how you come to this conclusion?

It defeats my sense of logic, so I would be absolutely on edge to know how you worked this one out.

8/25/2009 10:00:01 AM

Horsefeathers

"if evolution was real humans, and animals alike would not need reproductive organs"

So, evolution is fake humans?

Ah, never mind. I see what you mean now. I didn't have my parser set to "moron".

Now then, why the hell would you not need reproductive organs if evolution were true? Evolution is all about reproduction you twit.

8/25/2009 10:00:02 AM

John

Some animals have reproductive organs; some don't. This has nothing to do with evolution, except that sexual reproduction speeds the process up by mixing genes from two individuals.

8/25/2009 10:02:26 AM

LOLWUT

What?

8/25/2009 10:02:39 AM

Papabear

As Headache said, plus, thank you for demonstrating your absolute lack of any knowledge about commas.

8/25/2009 10:03:56 AM

Morbo the Annihilator

GRAMMAR DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
GOODNIGHT!

8/25/2009 10:12:17 AM
1 2 3 4 5 7