Quote# 65093

Acually scientists have tried to disprove of God. Piltdown man was the first attempt. That was a fossil hoax said to have been done by Darwin himself. They have done many hoaxes to get the public to believe in evolution rarther than God. And there is evidence that humans lived with dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are not millions of years old. The? bible refers to them as the wild beasts.

GodsSoldier107, YouTube 51 Comments [8/28/2009 3:20:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 46
Submitted By: Charity Hawkins

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 | bottom


No way you can be that stupid

8/28/2009 3:23:13 PM


8/28/2009 3:23:25 PM


The Flintstones? Not a documentary.

8/28/2009 3:26:49 PM


They have done many hoaxes to get the public to believe in evolution rarther than God.

Citation seriously fucking needed.

8/28/2009 3:30:56 PM

D Laurier.

Actualy, No scientist has evertried to dissproove God.
Piltdown man was a patriotic attempt to give England an ancient ancestor to rival the french Cro Magnon, and the german Neandertal. Darwin had been dead a few years already by then, and it would have been social and academic suicide for him to concoct a hoax that REFUTED his prediction of a common ancestry for ALL humanity.

8/28/2009 3:31:56 PM

Doubting Thomas

This is stupid. Piltdown man was found to be a hoax primarily because he didn't fit in with what scientists had learned about evolutionary theory.

8/28/2009 3:33:09 PM

Evolutionary science is not out to disprove God.

8/28/2009 3:34:47 PM


Maybe I'm missing something, but how did Darwin manage to fake samples which were discovered three decades after his death?

8/28/2009 3:35:07 PM

Yeah yeah, all the sciences are nothing but attempts to disprove God. It's all about your stupid religion.

8/28/2009 3:51:34 PM


Acually scientists have tried to disprove of God.

Not true. Scientists work with evidence, and since there is no evidence of any gods, there is no need for an effort to disprove them.

And there is evidence that humans lived with dinosaurs.

Cite sources please.

The? bible refers to them as the wild beasts.

Yeah, that's not vague at all.

8/28/2009 3:51:57 PM


Darwin did Piltdown man?

That would be quite amazing, seeing how Piltdown man was created in 1912, 30 years after Darwin died. If he was responsible, maybe I should worship him as the messiah.

8/28/2009 3:53:59 PM

Reverend Jeremiah

Your God has never been successfully proven to exist. We do not just "by default" consider that your version of Jesus Christ exists, is god, and is a creator.

"Wild beasts" could me anything, including humans you dork. I think if a T-rex or a velociraptor existed during the authors time, he would not speak of them in passing and such generalized language...

..first off Humans would be cattle to the T-rex and velociraptor..

..well, that kind of screws the whole concept you were trying to pu out.

8/28/2009 4:09:45 PM


You have to really try hard to acheive this level of stupidity

8/28/2009 4:15:56 PM


Just because some individuals have tried to disprove god/s, by any means available to them, does not mean scientists as a whole have tried to or make that their primary (or secondary or tertiary or. . .) goal. The vast majority of scientists just want to do science, preferably in peace instead of having to fend off people like you all the time.

That, and a hoax clearly does not do anything to disprove anything, except itself eventually.

As for Darwin perpetrating it, the pieces weren't found (or claimed to be found) until 1912; Darwin died in 1882. That took me 10 seconds to find, mainly waiting for pages to load.

8/28/2009 4:16:43 PM


"The Flintstones" was just a cartoon, you moron!

8/28/2009 4:17:31 PM


Just because scientific findings contradict your religion doesn't mean that it was done with intent. Stop being so paranoid; as far as it conerns you, science hasn't disproven God, so quit yer bitchin'.

8/28/2009 4:25:25 PM


Evolution of homo sapiens does not disprove God you ignoramus.

8/28/2009 4:30:12 PM


I'm guessing you're 13, maybe 14 tops, and home-schooled.

Oh, and as for Piltdown man? Who do you think it was that exposed it as a hoax? Was it creationists? Was it fundamentalist, ignorant, bible literalists, too busy worshipping their book to have any way of knowing what is real and what is fantasy? No, it was *SCIENTISTS*. As it always is.

8/28/2009 4:34:34 PM


8/28/2009 4:43:10 PM



8/28/2009 4:47:13 PM


Piltdown Man, even if it had been genuine, wouldn't have proved anything except that ancient hominids had been in England. It never had anything to do with "proving evolution". The "evidence" that dinosaurs lived with humans is a hoax, or at least stupid. See "Paluxy Man Tracks".

8/28/2009 4:54:52 PM


Wow! Darwin really got around.... Piltdown man was "discovered" about 40 years after his death.

8/28/2009 5:02:18 PM

Thinking Allowed

Darwin must be pretty good since the Piltdown man was "discovered" 30 years after his death. I sure wish I have that kind of talent when I'm long dead.

8/28/2009 5:21:23 PM

"And there is evidence that humans lived with dinosaurs."
No, there's not. If we had, we'd see the sort of clear evidence of it we DO see for Pleistocene mammals.

And we don't. I have yet to see a supposed drawing of a dinosaur that was even close to scientifically accurate (and most of them are comically INaccurate).

8/28/2009 5:44:13 PM

Porky Pine

"That was a fossil hoax said to have been done by Darwin himself."


8/28/2009 6:01:25 PM

1 2 3 | top: comments page