Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 65830

Correct. There is actually strong scientific evidence to suggest that the negro evolved along different lines than the rest of the human population. There are actually two strands of genetic lineage in the human race - the African negro and everyone else. Studies show that the negro's skull and jaw structure are actually closer to those of a primate than the rest of the human population. This is why negros typically have large, flat noses (like a gorilla), heavy jaws, and sloping brows.

The Real American Cowboy, RSTDT Comments 81 Comments [9/20/2009 3:50:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4
#1027091
Tolpuddle Martyr

Funny? Try completely irrelevant! Given that homo sapiens evolved in Africa to begin with it'd make sense that you would find related species there.

9/24/2009 3:34:07 PM
#1027124
Mister J

How about you stop dodging my questions and be man enough to actually defend your retarded hyperboles. I remind you that you still haven't:

-Cited any formal research that defines races as separate species
-Explained why mixed-race individuals are perfectly healthy and capable of reproducing despite your idea of races being completely separate from one another
-Given a proper reference to the fossil record as to when this "speciation" of races took place. All races share the same common features of Homo Sapiens Sapiens, with differences in melanin content or facial features superficial at best, along with near-identical mitochondrial DNA. How do you explain that, if Africans are indeed "lower" than white people?

9/24/2009 5:26:08 PM
#1027128
wintermute

TRAC:

Primates are native to Africa, South America, Europe and Asia. Blacks "can be found" in all these places, but also Australia, North America, and anywhere else there are people. Contrariwise, there are white people on all the continents that have primates.

However, even if what you said was true, or made sense, how would it help your argument. Birds first appeared in what is now China; does that mean that Chinese people are more closely related to birds than to other humans?

9/24/2009 5:36:56 PM
#1027196
The Real American Cowboy

Hold your horses, folks. Where did I say that niggers were a seperate SPECIES? Where? Show it to me. Come on, I dare you.

All I said was that they are closer to the missing link thank the rest of us; since human life began in Africa (as you guys rightly point out), it stands to reason that the African negro was the first off the evolutionary boat, so to speak. As he migrated northward, his skin became lighter (the middle east, where people have tanned olive skin, to Europe and Asia, where people are fair-skinned). This corresponded with a rise in evolutionary maturity.

9/24/2009 8:26:17 PM
#1027383
wintermute

"All I said was that they are closer to the missing link thank the rest of us; since human life began in Africa (as you guys rightly point out), it stands to reason that the African negro was the first off the evolutionary boat, so to speak."

So your point is that when some tribes left Africa, the ones who stayed where they were magically stopped evolving? Do you honestly think that only one group can evolve at a time?

"As he migrated northward, his skin became lighter (the middle east, where people have tanned olive skin, to Europe and Asia, where people are fair-skinned)."

Yes, skin colour is very mutable; a few tens of thousands of years of different rates of UV exposure is sufficient to change it. I'm not sure how this makes it more significant than, for example, the amount of body hair as an indication of who's most closely related to non-human apes.

"This corresponded with a rise in evolutionary maturity."

What does this even mean? What is "evolutionary maturity"? Can you quantify the amount of "evolutionary maturity" shown by Australian aboriginies (who you claim are highly evolved, because they left Africa very early and live on a continent with no apes, or even placental mammals), as compared to the Masai?

9/25/2009 6:15:44 AM
#1027443
Gloria

@ TRAC
"Where did I say that niggers were a seperate SPECIES?"

when you said that black people have a completely separate evolutionary lineage and referenced a page tagged as "science proves N****** are not human" to try to back up your points

Your current argument (that there is only one 'strand of genetic lineage' but blacks are not as far along it) is still stupid. As wintermute said, evolution continues regardless of your location. If Africa had magical anti-evolution vibes that prevented Africans from evolving further the human race wouldn't exist in the first place.

9/25/2009 9:05:29 AM
#1028002
The Real American Cowboy

88, you may have a point. Monkeys, at least, stay in their natural habitat and don't bother anyone. Blacks, however, insist on invading white societies and destroying white cultures.

BTW, I'm curious, 88 - what are your views on government? One of the problems that I have with the Neo-Nazi movement is that Nazis (fascists) seem to favor a big government. While I agree with most of the pro-white elements of the movement, as a libertarian, I favor a small government system that stays out of peoples' business.

9/26/2009 10:03:17 AM
#1028016


There is strongly evidence that we're all homo sapiens. Try not to invent data.

9/26/2009 10:10:26 AM
#1028049
John Galt

@ Cowfucker

Um, it was whites who brought blacks to the US. Your people pulled them out of their homes, destroyed their lands, robbed them of ther wealth, treated them in ways that would make Stalin cringe, and now you're complaining about them "invading?" I hope you'll enjoy it when non-whites turn whites into a minority in the US in 2050. Don't think of it as an "invasion," think of it as payback.

PS You're not a libertarian, dipshit.

(and for the rest of you, I was speaking in a language called dumbshit. I'm not fluent in it. Only these guys would understand it)

9/26/2009 12:47:51 PM
#1028057
LH

Your people pulled them out of their homes, destroyed their lands, robbed them of ther wealth, treated them in ways that would make Stalin cringe


Actually, most slaves were sold by other Blacks.

9/26/2009 1:15:05 PM
#1028063
Mister J

FOR THE LAST TIME: QUOTE A GODDAMN CITATION

You and 88 have once again claimed that black people are a species. Prove it. I don't care what study you quote- fossil records, mitochondrial DNA, whatever- so long that a reputable source in anthropology that has come to a conclusion that black people aren't Homo Sapiens Sapiens.

THEN after you've finished doing that I want you to explain why the hell can black people successfully breed with "other" humans to produce offspring that in turn can breed without any deficiencies- something that no inter-species offspring can otherwise do.

As previously mentioned here, where do you place Australian Aborigines on that Lamarckian "ladder" of yours?

Still confident that you can explain all that, you impotent, inbred hillbilly-wannabe? Explain how the "inferior" black race managed to form kingdoms like the Kongo, Mali and Abyssinia- civilisations with a professional military, civil service and unique languages- AND successfully resist Western imperialism for centuries (how's this: the fascists you so ardently jack-off to only managed in the last century to finally conquer Abyssinia)

88: You seem to have a burning desire to help out your cow-fucking friend here, why don't you chip in?

9/26/2009 1:25:48 PM
#1028083
LH

Of course, my previous statement still doesn't excuse the West for actively exploiting it to an industrial level. After all, in the grand scheme of things the aforementioned Africans only in part contributed to the Slave Triangle- the plantations that the slaves were brutally worked to death on, and the ships that they were forcefully crushed together like sardines were both provided and maintained by European, and then later American owners...

9/26/2009 2:38:15 PM
#1028084
The Real American Cowboy

While we're citing citations, why don't you show me where I called blacks a seperate species. Go ahead. 88 and I will be throwing back a few beers while you find.

9/26/2009 2:38:23 PM
#1028085
The Real American Cowboy

And the aborigines are another black people group who have never built a civilization and still remain squatting behind bushes and eating kangaroo even today. Why am I not surprised? It looks like you just made my point for me - two different negro populations, on totally seperate continents, and both equally primitive.

WTF is Abyssinia, anyway?

9/26/2009 2:39:52 PM
#1028086
The Real American Cowboy

John Galt, first of all, Ayn Rand would have nothing to do with an asspipe like you. If she were around today, she'd go for a real man like me, and we both know that.

That being said, I've repeatedly stated on these boards that I think the decision of the American government to bring negros into the United States was a HUGE mistake. It is one of the biggest mistakes in American history, Galt, and we are still paying the price for it today. Unfortunately, we're on the verge of repeating the same mistake, as we're now importing Mexicans to do labor in the United States. One day we're going to wake up, and the Mexicans will have taken over, just like the blacks did. It won't be long before we have a Mexican president at this rate.

9/26/2009 2:45:08 PM
#1028088
Mister J

You made the claim when you said that black people have a completely separate evolutionary lineage and referenced a page tagged as "science proves N****** are not human" to try to back up your points. Again, you still haven't answered wintermute's challenge that your "ladder" idea of evolution was debunked ages ago.

Also, 88 said: "I'm inclined to say that s****** should be considered an inferior species to monkeys."

Do you suffer from a basic comprehension deficiency as well as being generally wrong in everything? If you're going to claim that humans became more "advanced" (for want of a better term I guess) you have to take into account that Australia was one of the last continents colonised by humans: hundreds of thousands of years after your so-called "white men" developed on mainland Europe. Aborigines came to Australia well after your so-called "inferior" Africans and "superior" white races were established- so in your view they ought to have been superior due to this time difference, right? The two races developed with a massive time gap between them- your idea that humanity somehow became more intelligent over time is bullshit.

As for your last cry of ignorance: Abyssinia is a name given to the Ethiopian Empire (lasting, ironically enough, longer than the Roman Empire)- a cursory Google search would have told you all you needed to know. Do yourself a favour and look up Benin and Mali as well- it's a far cry from your moronic claim of "jungle savagery" being prevalent in Africa that you so ardently cling to.

9/26/2009 2:57:26 PM
#1028089
Mister J

Ayn Rand believed that all sex was rape anyway, so that fits right in with your mentality, doesn't it?

9/26/2009 3:00:18 PM
#1028097
LH

"LH

Of course, my previous statement still doesn't excuse the West for actively exploiting it to an industrial level. After all, in the grand scheme of things the aforementioned Africans only in part contributed to the Slave Triangle- the plantations that the slaves were brutally worked to death on, and the ships that they were forcefully crushed together like sardines were both provided and maintained by European, and then later American owners..."


So what ? Slavery was the norm until we decided to abolish it. Almost all civilizations or human groups practiced it at some point during their histories, some Arab states were still trading African slaves as recently as 100 years ago. We don't owe any apology to anybody.

9/26/2009 3:37:06 PM
#1028098
When has libertarianism ever been relevant? Social democracy ftw

Just thought I'd contribute a few points:

1) European civilisation only really got off the ground after the advances made in farming from civilisations like Egypt and those in Mesopotamia (Iraq) & the Indus Valley (India).

2) Even at it's height Classical civilisation still had to contend with the Persian Empire to the East, the last remnants of which were finally finished off by the Turkish Ottoman Empire too.

3) The Crusades failed miserably in the long run- Palestine remained predominately an Islamic possession.

4) The Renaissance was only possible due to the simultaneous advances in Islamic science & medicine & the translated texts from the Classical period in their possession that were otherwise lost in the West.

5) Also, lol China/India/Mayan civilisations...

("White") Europe becoming the dominant force in the world really only came about in the last 500 years of the 100,000 years that modern humans have been around, and was due (to summarise a multitude of different factors) to dumb luck.

9/26/2009 3:43:31 PM
#1028108
John Galt

John Galt, first of all, Ayn Rand would have nothing to do with an asspipe like you. If she were around today, she'd go for a real man like me, and we both know that.

That being said, I've repeatedly stated on these boards that I think the decision of the American government to bring negros into the United States was a HUGE mistake. It is one of the biggest mistakes in American history, Galt, and we are still paying the price for it today. Unfortunately, we're on the verge of repeating the same mistake, as we're now importing Mexicans to do labor in the United States. One day we're going to wake up, and the Mexicans will have taken over, just like the blacks did. It won't be long before we have a Mexican president at this rate.

First of all, I don't why you'd want to be with a Jew like Ayn Rand in the first place. And you're gay, you've shown that repeatedly here, I don't know why you're talking about women. That's probably why your wife left you...

Second, that doesn't take away from the fact that it was whites that committed these atrocities against blacks, before they could even have a chance to do anything great. To blame blacks for their shortcomings is absolutely moronic. It's like cutting off someone's leg in a race and then telling them you won when the race is over.

Third, importing Mexicans is not slavery, they're working for pay, and they're doing the jobs that asshats like yourself won't do.

9/26/2009 4:33:34 PM
#1028158
wintermute

"Blacks, however, insist on invading white societies and destroying white cultures."

Right, because whites never invaded African societies, or destroyed African cultures.



"And the aborigines are another black people group who have never built a civilization and still remain squatting behind bushes and eating kangaroo even today. Why am I not surprised? It looks like you just made my point for me - two different negro populations, on totally seperate continents, and both equally primitive."

No, your point was that Africans are inferior because they live on a continent where apes live, and because they magically stopped evolving when other groups moved into Eurasia. By contrast, Aboriginies evolved from Asians, who evolved from Middle-Easterners, both groups that you consider "more highly evolved" than blacks, and they live on a continent with even fewer apes than Europe. Therefore, by your stated logic, they should be the most advanced people on the planet.

If you think it proves your point that they're not, that presumably means that you're not taking your own arguments seriously. If you don't believe your evolutionary claims, why do you expect us to?

9/26/2009 7:14:56 PM
#1028214
Zipperback

"Wintermute, it's funny how blacks are found on continents where primates predominate, while whites can be found farther away from their jungle origins, where there are few if any monkeys, gorillas, etc."

Primates are found in South America, Africa, Southeast Asia and a few islands such as the Indonesian chains, Madagascar, ect.

There are very few blacks in China, Thailand, Borneo, Argentina and four to five centuries back there were none. Meanwhile China, Thailand Borneo Argentina and a number of other countries have considerable native monkey or ape populations. ONLY in southern Africa do you find indigenous blacks and primates.

Perhaps when you said "continents" you meant part of a single continent. For someone who "states the facts" you really are a pig ignorant failure.

9/27/2009 12:16:40 AM
#1029055
The Real American Cowboy

I'm sorry guys, you are correct. Some times my deep love of young black cock gets the best of me, and I have to try so hard to pretend that I don't want to know them in an anal way. I will go back to my pile of gay porn now, and masturbate while screaming "God Bless America" now.

9/28/2009 8:02:56 PM
#1029318
ProfChainsawFace

I fucking love this site. Now I will sit silently.


9/29/2009 8:21:29 PM
#1029729
The Real American Cowboy

Just forget it. I don't feel like arguing about it anymore. You guys are right, I'm just white trash. I'm a pisspoor American and a worthless cowboy.

9/30/2009 3:39:00 PM
1 2 3 4