1
#175752
binkerrr
The whole idea behind Christianity is crazy. If you believe in Christianity, you must also believe that one could come back to life, be born of a virgin mother, or walk on water. And if God shakes a bag long enough a watch will assemble itself. Get real!
3/4/2007 4:02:16 PM
#175841
Feel My Force
Um, no.
An explanation for the hard of thinking follows:
EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
3/4/2007 6:02:27 PM
#175849
BurntBush
Mirror, mirror on the wall.
3/4/2007 6:11:15 PM
#175851
Ambrielle
Logical fallacy. Why must we believe the watch thing if we believe in evolution? It doesn't follow. Grrr.
Claycountryredneck says it all.
3/4/2007 6:15:30 PM
#175901
Matty The Red
fail
3/4/2007 7:59:32 PM
#244012
he who knocks thee down a peg
those two things are...entirely unrelated
hey fucknuts, evolution is basically proven fact
6/1/2007 8:26:48 PM
#244022
anti-nonsense
EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
6/1/2007 8:32:39 PM
#244066
Puck
The First Church of Stupid Analogies checks in once again.
6/1/2007 8:50:50 PM
#244081
Brian X
Evolution doesn't work that way? LIFE doesn't work that way.
6/1/2007 8:57:09 PM
#244082
Wet Walnuts
I love it when people say \"if you believe in Proposition A, then you must also believe in [totally unrelated] Proposition B.\" Inevitably, I end up having to explain to these idiots what a \"non-sequitur\" is.
6/1/2007 8:57:38 PM
#244092
Sandman
But if you took an infinite number of Swiss watches and an infinite number of bags, it is inevitable that eventually one of them would through sheer blind chance reassemble itself through the shaking process.
Why do fundies not understand probabilities?
6/1/2007 9:02:55 PM
#244094
Laurel
6/1/2007 9:03:49 PM
#794163
fred
Funny thing is, if you shake the bag long enough it actually might reassemble itself :D Hooray for infinitesimal probabilties.
12/2/2008 9:21:38 PM
#794180
szaleniec
I don't have words to express how inutterably hilarious any and every "random assembly" analogy is to someone who did a degree in chemistry, learning about very non-random behaviour of chemical compounds.
12/2/2008 9:31:00 PM
#794366
Cheese
This is just another bad interpretation of Paley. I give it three.
12/2/2008 11:36:47 PM
#794393
debunked claim is debunked
I hope that was easy enough for you to understand
12/2/2008 11:53:48 PM
#934488
ChrisInManc
Hmmm, maybe if it were a Casio...
4/5/2009 2:02:09 AM
#1355709
Sentry Gun
There is a very thin but existent chance it happens. Plus chemistry is not total random. Do it for a billion year, I'm sure you will end up with something way simpler than a watch that, with the right reproductive system and external pressure, will end up as a watch.
Oh, wait, watches don't procreate !
12/9/2011 10:45:04 AM
#1356194
even though the theory of evolution says man evolved from another animal it does NOT say that if I run a person through a wood chipper and collect all the bits in a big garbage bag that the pieces will reassemble themselves no matter how hard or how long I shake the bag.
That would require a very old vampire or a necromancer, neither of which probably exist.
12/10/2011 10:32:51 PM
1