Oh stop being so nice.
Translation: Being nice to people with ideological differences isn't the christian thing to do. People who are nice toward the evil ones who have non-theological differences with us are not true christians.
I don't agree to disagree
Then you'll just have to accept being wrong instead.
This whole global warming/earth shift is bogus.
And I'm sure you got a bunch of real compelling scientific data that you can back up that claim with too, right? Didn't think so
And those scientists really aren't as respected as they think they are
I doubt that a science denying RR poster is an authority on who is or is not respected within the scientific community.
The events that happen in the tribulation will NOT be explainable by science, it will be by the Hand of God.
And your scriptural basis for making that claim is what? You can't answer that because you don't have one. The entirety of the claims you people make about the rapture, tribulation, and end of the world is based 100% on works of fiction and fanfic created by other RR'ers.
The worldwide earthquakes will not have any good scientific reason behind them.
Chapter & verse please?
Certainly the tribulation is so close, that global warming will not have the time to manifest.
Am I supposed to think that you know when it will happen? The people who thought it was all imminent in the first century A.D. were wrong so what makes you think you have any better insight? People have been claiming that the end of the world is just around the corner for the whole of recorded history. They were all wrong, every last one of them, so what makes you think you are right? Especially in light of the fact that your own holy book tells you that you cannot possibly know the time.
God will cause a third of the stars to fall, bring the sun closer to the earth to bake it in heat---that will melt the ice, not man made warming.
That wouldn't "melt the ice", that would incinerate the entire planet. Also where are the stars going to "fall" from they don't actually hang in the sky.
This is pseudo science. not real science
I not only doubt, I also reject the idea that you are at all qualified to tell the difference between real science and crackpot science. And mu reasoning behind that is your demnstrated history of proclaiming only the things you agree with as true and rejecting the rest without so much as considering the evidence. You are a hack, a willfully ingnorant, uncurious, and intellectually dishonest fraud.