@Phed:
"Bullshit. Whatever you feel or think about Wilders, he's clearly not a racist: he is close friends with Hirshi Ayaan (who's quite black) and Ehsam Jahmi (who's Iranian). Wilders (who himself likely part of Indonesian descent) has travelled the Mid East and knows quite a bit about Islam. More than most politically correct 'liberals' want people to know....
F*ck off. You're a liar. He never said a think about 'brown people'. And as I said, he actually has 'brown' people in his party, voting for him. In fact he is part 'brown' it seems (he has partly Indonesian roots).
You can agree of disagree with his tough stance on Islam but don't try to play the racism card."
What total bullshit. Just because he knows and is friends with a couple of black and or brown people does not mean he is not a racist. Even the BNP boasts Jewish and Indian members and staff. Does that mean the BNP is not a racist or anti-Semitic party? Hell no! Fact is that this argument of Wilders focuses on headscarves and his reaction to the questions directed at him shows us his racist roots: nothing would be done against Christian headscarves, only Muslim headscarves. Why? Whichever way you look at it, xenophobic or racist, it's certainly nothing to do with equality or being secular. Wilders is Grade A dipshit. You think he knows a lot about Islam? That's like saying that an anti-Semite knows a lot about Judaism! Give me a break! Hitler or any of the KKK or white supremacist members knew and know nothing about Judaism, yet they attacked and continue to attack them whenever possible, based simply on them not being Christian. Wilders is continuing that legacy, however, since it is illegal to bash the Jews as he would like, he is picking on the Muslims. Just like the BNP, who themselves have admitted that the only reason they have switched to attacking Islam and Muslims is because it is frowned upon to say the same about Jews. Wilders is working from the same mindset.
"You know the kind of people who have no real problem with people demanding the most outrageous things such as not having to shake hands with people of the opposite sex, calling for the death of Jews or refusing to accept homosexuality. As long as those bigots are 'brown' that is."
And Wilders is in the same category as those people. He is no different.
"His headscarftax proposal clearly wasn't a proposal to be taken literally - it's rhetoric - directed against a religion that actually imposed a tax (Jizya) on those of other faiths (Dhimmis)."
Then again, imposing a tax on non-Christians and non-Christian clothing wouldnt be without any any historical precedent. The Christians imposed heavy taxes on Jews and Muslims for a very long time, just for being non-Christian. Want a nice starting point to read about all of that bullshit that non-scholar revisionists like Gisele Littman are now hurriedly projecting onto the Muslims so as to take away the historical truth about things like Jizya imposed by Christians? Read up on the Marrano.
"Actually I believe he proposed it be used for 'blijf van mijn lijf huizen'. Safe houses for women who suffer from abusive husbands / brother / uncles / fathers or loverboys. Guess what kind of women make up the majority of those safe houses?
The kind of women that are also likely to end up the victim of 'honour killing.'"
Ofcourse, because the others are too afraid to acutally do something about it. They stay with their men because according to their religion they cannot get a divorce for that. Ofcourse, no word on this from a racist/xenophobe/nazi like Wilders.
"Perhaps some people should remember it's Wilders who lives under 24/7 protection and has to sleep in a concrete prison - not his victims. "
If a Muslim had said and done the things Wilders had said and done, he too would be living in a concrete prison 24/7, and with good reason. However, Wilders the nazi is free to roam one of my favourite countries.