Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 66073



Answers in Genesis, Answers in Genesis 80 Comments [9/30/2009 11:09:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 56
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3 4
Wayte

I love how these people completely miss the concept of science...

1/25/2010 11:21:20 PM

ecoline

Astute observation, and the exact reason that science works better than religion when it comes to practical applications.
'Course, I'd have some nits to pick re: the definition of "belief" vs. accepting a theory, and the mistaken impression that the theory of evolution aspires to being an origin story/moral compass/basis of a religion, like the bible does.

1/26/2010 5:51:40 AM

Swede

I will trust the one that has been tested and tested and tested, not the one that is never allowed to be questioned.

If it has never been rewritten, then what are all these different versions? KJV is not 2000 years old, it's precisely 399 years old (according to Wikipeida).

1/26/2010 9:45:41 AM

Anon-e-moose

Evolution. Rewritten & rewritten...

So? New evidence is always found, thus Darwin's original theory is contantly updated to take into account said evidence which reinforces the facts about Evolution.

Facts being the operative word.

The Bible. 'It is written'. O RLY?:

http://www.tyndalearchive.com/Scriptures/index.htm

And that's just the English versions. The KJV was edited. By a homosexual no less.

Your call, fundies.

1/26/2010 9:54:59 AM



I'm going to trust the book on the right because it is rewritten and rewritten and rewritten and rewritten and rewritten, which means it is relavant to our present time, unlike that strange book with the cross on it.

3/25/2010 12:09:20 PM

Anemone

I'd pick the book that's current and contains up to date scientific information. By the way, it's called the Origin of Species, dumb ass.

3/25/2010 3:11:22 PM

David B.

Which value of pi are you going to trust?

The bible's?
[size=18]Pi = 3[/size]

Or science's?
[size=18]Pi = 22/7 355/113 103993/33102
3.14159[/size][size=17]26535[/size][size=16]89793[/size][size=15]23846[/size][size=14]26433[/size][size=13]83279[/size][size=12]50288[/size][size=11]41971[/size][size=10]69399[/size][size=9]37510[/size][size=8]58209[/size][size=7]74944[/size][size=6]59230[/size][size=4]78164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303820...[/size]

3/25/2010 3:20:48 PM

David B.

Consistency, it's only a good thing if you're not always wrong.

3/25/2010 3:26:55 PM

Amanda

The second one. At least they're updating it with current facts and theories.

3/25/2010 6:50:08 PM

Evil Left-Wing Feminist

OH NOES
THEY'RE REVISING AND REVISING TO FIT NEW SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES

5/3/2010 6:32:46 AM

Phisshy

Researchers and writers of scientific textbooks know when to suck it up when their first assumptions don't match the data.

But some fundies don't know how to take their ideological lumps and bruises like a man!

5/3/2010 9:43:19 AM

D

Mirror awards anyone?

5/3/2010 4:50:16 PM



Umm is the book on the right the correct answer?

1/2/2011 1:30:17 PM

The Duelist

I prefer the one that's been proven over the one that's been thoroughly refuted by legions of historians and scholars, and tells you that selling your daughter as a sex slave and beating slaves to death is permissible, but homosexuality is an abomination(which has also been refuted).

1/4/2011 5:06:25 PM

thatotherguy

Which one are you going to trust?

Evolution: it is revised, and improved, and revised...

OR...

Bible: "It is written" but then mistranslated and parts get stuck in from time to time even though they shouldn't be and ...

1/4/2011 11:50:16 PM

Justanotheratheist

Consider how much the world has changed in 2000 years and then consider how a book that has not changed one iota in 2000 years can possibly be accurate.

Thinking people continue to grow mentally, that's why theories are revisited and opinions revised as new evidence comes to light. Clinging to a book that has remained constant for two millennia is not much different from a fully grown man trying to fit into the first set of baby clothes he ever wore.


1/5/2011 2:18:46 AM

Sasori

SPOING!

6/7/2011 3:25:08 PM

Moondog

"Why aren't women alloed to go to the stoning, Mum?"
"Because it's written, that's why!!!"

6/7/2011 7:16:19 PM

Quantum Mechanic

It is forged.
You lose.

7/10/2011 6:18:31 AM

apatheist

Wait... Hasn't the bible undergone a few dozen revisions too? Then there's the matter of lost in translation and it's undergone a few dozen of those two.

7/10/2011 5:57:42 PM

Ebon

One changes to accommodate facts, the other doesn't.

9/7/2012 4:01:23 PM

Quantum Mechanic

Babble's be re-forged countless times, liar.

11/14/2012 10:04:04 AM



Sane people change their minds when they realize that they were wrong.

11/15/2012 6:51:51 AM

Quantum Mechanic

Genesis contradicts itself at least 83 times.
Maybe a competent editor would have helped.

5/3/2013 12:31:11 PM



Neither, because the only person who would write a book called "Evolution BELIEF" is some brain-dead fundie who thought he was clever, just like the only person who would write a book like the Bible is an ignorant sheep herder.

5/3/2013 5:33:22 PM
1 2 3 4