Generalizations for Jesus!
6/21/2007 12:20:03 AM
Strawman Two: Duuurrr, the sheep!
6/21/2007 12:25:27 AM
Actually, from what submissions I've seen on FSTDT, I would conclude that fundies are the ones obsessed with bestiality.
I mean, anyone notice how most anti-homosexuality arguments of fundies usually refer to irrelevant bestiality practices?
6/21/2007 12:37:06 AM
1) There really isn't that much interest in bestiality to begin with.
2) Animals cannot give meaningful consent to the advances of a human, with the possible exception of dolphins and certain primates. Given that such a thing cannot be proven, one must assume that consent cannot be given there either. (Atheists are big on that "consent" thing.)
3) From an epidemiological standpoint, fucking a sheep is fairly stupid, potentially a form of Russian roulette. Do you really want to find out what sheep STDs can infect humans first-hand, not to mention potentially pass it on to another human?
6/21/2007 12:55:46 AM
It's very much the same sort of thing as how the Roman Catholic Church can't seem to distinguish between pedophilia (very, very bad), ephebophilia (not as bad, but still an abuse of power), and homosexuality (more or less harmless, at least if practiced properly). If you put it all under the category of "sin", you likely can't be bothered to make a distinction based on impact because it's already been declared a Bad Thing.
6/21/2007 12:58:08 AM
What is it with fundies and bestiality?
6/21/2007 6:45:27 AM
"Atheists See No Problem With Human To Animal Sex... In response to a question about human to animal sex being illegal:
Atheist one...: Q. Why have laws preventing men from bedding sheep? A. Because they smell bad.
Translation: Its... too late to translate... can feel energy sraining.
Real answer: No consent, dodgy STDs other than that, whatever! What reasons do YOU have against bestiality.
Atheist two [asked if it should be legalized]...: Who would be harmed?"
Answer: A very good question, however, one that can be answered by the above answer.
I understand that the above thread isn't very good, but I wrote it at 10, the fundies seem to be letting go of themselves of late, and I am too tired.
And Brian X; the Ctholic Church sees nothing wrong with paedophilia, so long as its hetero- its only says it is bad to the public to prevent it looking bad, whereas harmless homos are sinners.
6/21/2007 6:54:44 AM
Who or what smells bad? Men? Sheep? The laws? I'm confused.
6/21/2007 10:42:51 AM
Actually, Christians have actually said that they would prefer bestiality to consensual human homosexuality, saying that it is a lesser evil.
By the way, I can't seem to find the quote on here that says that because the search link isn't working... anyone mind giving it to me?
6/21/2007 12:13:10 PM
In Texas, during a time when rallying was being held to pass a law banning consensual homosexual sex between two people, there was also rallying from most of the same group to get rid of a current law banning beastiality.
So the message is "Homosexuality: Bad. Texas-Style Dog Fucking: Good."
6/22/2007 12:54:35 PM
seer's post is making me horny.
RELEASE THE GERBILS!
6/23/2007 11:30:26 PM
Aren't you the modest one? Discussing details on where people should and shouldn't put their dicks.
6/24/2007 7:34:03 AM
Wait, so... fundies are saying that without an invisible man in the sky, we have no reason to ban sex with animals?
6/24/2007 11:19:52 AM
Animals can't consent to sex
11/7/2010 9:41:55 AM
Really? You don't think that there is any harm caused by bestiality? Because I would have thought that such actions would be really painful and abusive to the sheep.
11/7/2010 11:35:02 AM
And yet, it was a Teabagger/Republican (Carl Paladino) who sent video of a woman having sex with a horse.
11/7/2010 3:38:43 PM
@Mr_Vorhias: That's . . . er . . . wow. I don't get it - how is bestiality the lesser evil when compared to homosexuality?
11/7/2010 3:47:49 PM
I find quite inconsistent that we may exploit animals, kill them in gruesome ways, eat them and breed them by the million in atrocious conditions to those very purposes, but somehow fucking one is wrong because it "harms the sheep". Seriously?
And no, I'm not into animal sex.
3/25/2012 3:56:24 AM
Nice strawmen you've got there, seer. Your own design?
Even if these are real atheists, so what? Do you concur with everything that religious people say or do? What about Mohammed Merah in Toulouse, France or Anders Behring Breivik i Oslo, Norway? There are stupid and crazy religious people, just as there are stupid and crazy non-religious people.
Sex without consent is rape. Animals can't give definitive consent, ergo sex with animals is rape.
3/25/2012 4:41:53 AM
Informed consent, bitch!
11/24/2012 5:52:35 AM
Try getting a blowjob from a sheep. its a BAAAAd way to go.
11/24/2012 9:39:59 AM
I like how "Who would be harmed?" is treated like the dumbest reason anyone would ever not do anything. That's because "Godsaidso" is so much better!
11/24/2012 10:41:34 AM
You're right, there is nothing wrong with doing it with animals... except for that "consent" thing.
You don't know what consent is? Oh I'm sorry, consent is that thing where when someone says no he/she mean no. Something to you paid no mind to as you sell out your daughter to some +40 year old pedo...
2/27/2013 5:41:53 PM
So? At least we do see a problem with marrying out underaged against their will unlike you fundies.
See, I can also make generalizations.
3/5/2013 5:14:47 AM