Are poverty and starvation only an excuse for abortions?
When a serial killer of women acts, nobody says that it is OK because he is getting women "freedom of misery".
It is evident that not all his victims were poor and that murder is not the way to solve poverty.
Is it not evident then that argument, applied to infanticide is only a dirty trick to say that it is compassionate an evil selfish action?
27 comments
If you fundies weren't so against proper sex education, contraceptives, and birth control, there wouldn't be a need for so many abortions in the first place. It sickens me that these anti-choice zealots are even against aborting a pregnancy that is the result of a rape, or a pregnancy with complications that threaten the mother's life.
I dont understand the point this fundy is trying to make.
If said serial killer went around killing children, it would be applicable, but killing women?
It is also worth noting that, the death of a child would improve the financial situation of the relevant family, sure it will be emotionally painful to loose said child, but that would not change the fact that a burden on the livelyhood of the family has been removed.
Abortion just removes the potential of that burden eariler, and without the undue suffering of the child and parent.
Fundie : "Dun't aburt baybis!"
Regular Person : "Okay, I'll use a condom!"
Fundie : "NO! NO COMDONS !!! NO COMDONS!!!! WAAAAAAHH"
Regular Person : "Okay, I guess I'll just wank it then."
Fundie : "NOOOOO!!! UVRY spurm is SAKRID!"
Regular Person : "You're not making this easy, y'know."
No, it is not evident, fucktard. Non-sentient clumps of cells do not own anything and are neither rich nor poor, and that hasn't got anything to do with anything anyway. God damn you people are fucking stupid.
Their "God" being is responsible for far more abortions than all the medically assisted abortions carried out throughout the world.
Any miscarriage is a spontaneous abortion if you believe in God you must also believe he is a baby killer !
"Is it not evident then that argument, applied to infanticide is only a dirty trick to say that it is compassionate an evil selfish action?"
Is it not evident that a dot is not an infant? Apparently not to christianists.
No, but it's pretty fucking hypocritical when you both try to ban all abortions AND refuse to do jack shit for the babies AFTER they're born.
Ironically, most pro-lifers are also anti-welfare. How much does Cyber really care about the children of the world once they're ex utero ?
Most people who are pro-choice aren't pro-abortion; we'd vastly prefer it if abortions were unnecessary and people had sex responsibly, using contraceptives. Sadly, this isn't happening. It likely never will, but your efforts in the sex education department certainly aren't helping.
No, poverty and starvation are two of the REASONS for abortons, among others. Women don't need "excuses" to make the decision to remove a parasitic clump of cells from their bodies if they don't want it to be there. Period.
So you are trying to attribute the ethics of Jack The Ripper, for example, in order to justify your rant on abortion...?
Do you want to return to the "Good Old Days" in which the average life expectancy for a average human being, living in poverty, was less than 20 years, & the child mortality rate was on the order of 60% and above, depending on which slum you were living in...?
If you do wish the above, then I am disgusted by your apparent lack of humanity...
"The Jews are not the people that will be blamed for nothing" - Graffiti attributed to Jack The Ripper, found at one of the murder scenes...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.