"Mark Levin is now on a crusade to..."
Therein lies the problem.
And sure, a site that's open to ALL to edit at will (save for an ordered page lockdown) is purely going to tell one side.
Damn, it takes a lot to outfox the turds at Moonbatshittery.
10/25/2009 11:06:50 PM
Wow and i use wikipedia to just fuck with my friends when they have to do reports. Kids, dont use wiki
10/25/2009 11:26:58 PM
Reality has a liberal bias
And you do realize that anyone can change Wikipedia don't you?
10/25/2009 11:43:39 PM
Your impotent anger amuses me.
10/25/2009 11:54:00 PM
Nathan the Wise
So Wikipedia slimes Barack Obama, then?
10/26/2009 12:54:17 AM
In other words, it contains some facts about Republicans, instead of the lies you hear (and omissions you don't hear) on FOX News.
10/26/2009 1:04:17 AM
Well, seeing as any idiot can edit Wikipedia, all you have to do is go in and change what you don't agree with. Of course you have Conservapedia, which is even more full of shit.
10/26/2009 3:47:02 AM
I find it hilarious that adherence to reality and facts is considered to be "liberal bias".
10/26/2009 4:43:21 AM
Well, if you did check Wikipedia, you'd find that there are huge political and historical differences between Fidel Castro, Robert Mugabe, and Hugo Chavez. For starters, you'd discover that one is a revolutionary who metamorphosed into a dictator, another is a common thug and criminal, and the third an elected official of a sovereign country.
Also, you might look up cockroaches. They are remarkable insects.
10/26/2009 9:26:12 AM
"If it doesn't agree with me it must be slanted! It can't possibly be that I might be wrong!"
10/26/2009 9:36:59 AM
Yes, it's far more liberal than Conservapedia, which is completely batshit insane with all the right wing nutjobs posting there. Of course I never hear conservatards talking about conservative slant.
10/26/2009 7:24:06 PM
As opposed to you people who call any economic policy to the left of Ayn Rand "communism"?
8/21/2012 2:08:44 PM