(Concerning the bombing of the moon)
The reason for this is more interesting than you would think though... the scientists are hoping that if there is water it can sustain a moon colony, so that astronauts can launch research on the many fossils from earth that are undisturbed on the moon (Yes there actually is a lot of matter from earth on the moon).
33 comments
Yes, vast quantities of what used to be the earth are now part of the moon.
Sadly, anything that left the earth to become the moon left in a very pulverized, melted, or vaporized state, and any fossils that may have existed would have been completely destroyed.
Maybe it would be more interesting if you knew what the hell you were talking about.
The real reason we bombed the moon was to get rid of that pesky monolith before it can contact the one orbiting Jupiter.
Because after the great flood all the water flew into outer space, hit the moon and left all the drowned dinosaurs there.
"bombing of the moon"
I'm pretty sure the concept is this: Deflect ice asteroids (which most are they reckon) into a planet) and terraform it into a more liquid world that then will develope an atmosphere.
Mars is the canidate for that, not the moon. We can't do it now and are a LONG way from being able to do that. It'll work, with a few hundred years after we're able to redirect ice asteroids at a large scale at Mars.
I'm hopeful, in that rosey Gene Roddenberry vision of our future but I think we're gonna be that Road Warrior scenario if we don't fuckin wise up. And if disastor and nuclear Armeggedon happens Australias the only one distant enough with the right tradewinds to survive in the world of Dumbfuckastania
ok, applying some logic - kind of
or
when the waters of the great deep broke loose at the start of the flud, much rock was sent into orbit by the high pressure water jets and the rocks and water hit the moon.
owww, my brain hurt itself ...
"This could even be neat for us to learn about..."
Well, it's about as ridiculous as all the other shit you "learn." The only stuff from earth on the moon is what the Apollo missions left behind, and I don't think that a 42 year old flag counts as a fossil.
And even if, in some bizarro alternative universe, fossils were found on the moon how the fuck would that "further prove" the flood of Noah? Are you saying the flood waters covered the earth to a height that included the fucking moon, a quarter or so million miles away?
PROTIP: The film "Iron Sky" is not a documentary.
... and the "Weekly World News" is just a comic. (as is the "Sunday Sport"; when not obsessed with tits, it [used to] had headlines such as 'WWII Bomber found on Moon', and other sorts of bullshit).
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
