Nathan the Wise
Yeah, about that ... remind us again about how Real True Xtians are a persecuted minority who ought to get special treatment.
11/3/2009 10:47:09 AM
At least someone finally admits to wanting discrimination. Now tell us exactly how discrimination is moral and right, and try not to use God this time?
11/3/2009 11:06:35 AM
Doubting Thomas FTW!
11/3/2009 11:31:16 AM
Just another freeper yelling stupid shit.
11/3/2009 11:46:25 AM
Same shit, different asshole.
One thing I know is harmful to children is being raised in a household where this kind of retarded attitude prevails.
11/3/2009 12:12:31 PM
Discrimination is still discrimination and is still abominable.
11/3/2009 12:21:05 PM
No, no, it's Fundamentalist Christianity that is harmful to children.
11/3/2009 1:48:41 PM
the old firm
Remember Kids: So does it look, when a Fundie tries to be honest!
11/4/2009 3:12:50 AM
"discriminating against and immoral and unhealthy lifestyle that can do considerable harm to children and is endorsed by a very small percentage of the population in favor of a moral lifestyle which gives balance to children and naturally represents an overwhelming majority of the population. "
This is why we discriminate against christians.
11/4/2009 8:13:56 AM
Thank you for admitting it. Now please go die in a fire.
11/4/2009 10:29:11 AM
Edit: Shit, the image didn't post. How do I get an image from my computer to here?
11/4/2009 11:14:43 AM
Allegory for Jesus
It isn't "immoral" just because you say it is.
It isn't "unhealthy" just because of the high proportion of AIDS in their population (which was incidental to the method of transmission coupled with the original people infected in our country ).
It doesn't do any harm of note to children. The only harm conceivable requires one to believe that homosexual=pedophile or to assume that homosexuality is itself a harmful state and promoting acceptance is an attempt at conversion. Both incredible leaps in logic.
And, finally, argumentum ad populum loses.
10/11/2010 4:09:12 PM
Children should not be subjected to any kind of sexuality, whether homo-, bi- or heteroseuxality.
A majority of the population (at least in Western countries) "endorse" the right of homosexuals and bisexuals to exist and enjoy the same human rights as everyone else.
Immoral is to sleep around and lie to the one you profess to love. What gender the loved one has, is of no importance.
An overwhelming majority of the population has no deblitating handicaps. Should we refuse equal human rights to handicapped people as well?
Also, an overwhelming majority of Earth's population is not Christian. Does that mean that it's unnatural to be Christian?
Or does it not matter how small or large a group is; they have the same right to be treated fairly and equally anyway?
10/12/2010 1:39:07 AM