Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 67812

Factotum666 - I have a $1000.00 that you cannot explain to me how DNA functions or is created in the body with its billions of known codes is to have evolved with out a living God - I will bet you an additional $1000.00 that you cannot adiquitly explain the functions of a living cell and its billions of function without a living God to believe that some how a living cell or DNA could have come out of some soupy gaseous mix is the complete Apex of stupidity, pride and conceit

creationistrue, Livescience 71 Comments [11/24/2009 7:47:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 59
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
Hammurabi

You're about to lose $2000.00.

11/24/2009 7:48:03 PM

Old Viking

I'll bet you $1,000 that you're not an English major at an Ivy League university.

11/24/2009 7:51:52 PM

The Bad Guy

I wonder how many "codes" are in God's DNA... and who created it.

11/24/2009 7:56:49 PM

Osiris

Believing that everything in the Universe was created for our benefit and that we are special in any which way is the apex of stupidity, pride, and conceit.

11/24/2009 7:57:17 PM

tracer

"... to believe that some how a living cell or DNA could have come out of some soupy gaseous mix ..."


EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

11/24/2009 7:57:49 PM

wintermute

Yeah, you're probably right that we can't explain it to you; can I claim the money if I explain it to a retarded hamster instead?

11/24/2009 8:00:05 PM

WMDKitty

So... did you pay up when you got pwned?

11/24/2009 8:10:13 PM

Berny

It's a safe bet. I don't think anyone could explain it to him in a way he could understand it.

11/24/2009 8:18:42 PM

iflurry

Double or nothing you can't type a coherent sentence?

11/24/2009 8:28:16 PM

breakerslion

Wrong. To believe that what you do not understand cannot possibly exist without the intervention of your alleged magic sky fairy is the zenith of stupidity, pride, and conceit.

"The model works without that assumption."

By the way, what is an incomplete apex?

11/24/2009 8:31:00 PM

Doubting Thomas

Of course, no proof that's offered will ever be good enough, and he'll just keep moving the goalposts.

I'm reminded of Kent Hovind's $10,000 challenge to prove evolution true, which also required one to prove the big bang theory and abiogenesis could only come about without a god being involved. Two things which have absolutely nothing to do with evolution and impossible to prove that God doesn't exist.

11/24/2009 8:39:14 PM

Itzpapalotl

I'll bet $1000 that you never passed English or Biology 101 with a grade above a C- and I'm being generous.

11/24/2009 8:43:27 PM

rubber chicken

I'd like you to prove that the $2000.00 really exists first.

11/24/2009 9:00:08 PM

atrasicarius

I dont think we can explain that to you either.

11/24/2009 9:00:48 PM

GreasetrapTheViking

So I assume by "adequately" s/he means "completely".

Nothing will ever be explained completely. That's the biggest difference between science and religion; science accepts that humanity will never know everything about the universe.

11/24/2009 9:04:51 PM

Fedup

adiquitly ?

11/24/2009 9:05:47 PM

livingdead70

Please tell me there is scientist that reads this and can take money from this jackass.

11/24/2009 9:18:49 PM

Noir the Sable

Creationistrue -- I have an entire campus's worth of biology, biomedical, and chem/biomolecular students and professors willing to take up that bet of yours.

11/24/2009 9:19:30 PM

Almafeta

Hey, can I take that challenge? I could use an easy $2000.

11/24/2009 9:22:28 PM

never been there

Step 1: Wikipedia
Step 2: Send Wikipedia $2K

11/24/2009 9:34:20 PM

Horsefeathers

"I have a $1000.00 that you cannot explain to me how DNA functions or is created in the body with its billions of known codes is to have evolved with out a living God"

I'm willing to be $1,000 that you wouldn't understand it if he did explain it to you.

"I will bet you an additional $1000.00 that you cannot adiquitly explain the functions of a living cell and its billions of function without a living God to believe that some how a living cell or DNA could have come out of some soupy gaseous mix is the complete"

Define "adequately". I suspect that your definition of adequate and mine are at odds. You likely want a soundbite size nugget of easy to digest information that completely explains every nuance of DNA, cells, biochemistry and so on offered in a manner a six year old would fully understand. Failing to do any of that will result in you claiming that it's an inadequate answer, I suspect.

"Apex of stupidity, pride and conceit"

You certainly are.

11/24/2009 9:34:22 PM

Sasha

Grammar is your friend. Get acquainted.

11/24/2009 9:52:31 PM

louislois

Something tells me creationistrue has gotten pwned countless times in debate.

11/24/2009 9:56:39 PM

Zoo

If you're the one determining whether the explanation is "adiquit", I think I'll decline to take you up on your bets.

11/24/2009 10:02:47 PM

Sagan'sGhost

Old Viking, I'll bet you that its not an English major at a 4th rate junior college.

11/24/2009 10:09:25 PM
1 2 3