"Let me ask you something. If you are an athiest why do you condemn Hitler.
I believe you mean an atheist. In which case I will have to respond; because the man is responsible for more deaths than the present population of my country. This sounds quite condemnation-worthy to me. So I go with it.
The concept of good and evil is defined in the Torah, The Old Testament, The Septuagint.
Aha, no. The concept of good and evil existed long before the Torah, Old Testament, and although I haven't heard of the 'Septuagint', I'm prepared to stake money on the concept not having sprung from there either. No, good and evil as ideas would have existed before nations, before priests, possibly before even shamans and tribal affiliation. It is called morality, and, with or without a god, we all at least partially have some.
If you do not believe in God why should we have love? That is an oxymoron!
How can your god be synonymous with love when he burns down cities, kills innocent children, and attempts to wipe out the human race?
We should murder, rob, rape and pillage to the best of our ability. Remember now, we are animals. We evolved from frogs and lizards. What is the Law of the Jungle? Survival of the fittest. That means if I want something I take it!
Except that, in social species (like humanity), the fittest animal is the one that is the most social. Murder, theft, rape, and pillage can safely be classified as anti-social behaviours, and are thus more likely to get you lynched than get you wealth and power.
The Romans had the right idea, if your an athiest. To make us happy on earth, man wants power, glory, worship, wealth.
The Romans worshipped many, many gods, so technically they must be more devout than you. And in any case, the Romans, before Christianity appeared, tended to reserve a special kind of extremely stylish and non-violent hatred for the wealthy, pretentious, and effete. I'm not saying they were a paragon society or anything, but they had, on the whole, a fine moral compass. Until they invented plumbing. See Nero.
Anybody that stands in our way, throw them in the gas chamber, cut their heads off, torture them, why don't we...
Because one, it's immoral, and two, it's totally insane. If this is how you picture the generally tolerant and non-violent atheist community, than you must have been dumped on your head many, many times as a child.
For married athiests, let me ask you this. If I like your wife, I can just take her. If you stand in my way, I can just strike you down.
If you strike me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
Seriously, though, I don't have a wife, being only 16, but you are welcome to come and try to 'take' my wife when and if I get one. But remember, by your own definition of atheist morality, she is free to beat the living fuck out of you and toss you out on the street with the rest of the trash. And then I will come and urinate on you.
Remember this, I am an evolved animal and I have no one to answer to. Can you comprehend that concept?
Even if you no longer have your hairy thunderer to answer to, you will still have to answer to me and any other victims of your insane crusade. And when I am really angry, I have an even more graphic and cruel sense of punishment than your god.
With that concept, you can boil and eat your parents when you get old and strong enough."
You, sir, are quite frankly an ass. If we atheists really thought like this, surely my parents would have eaten me when I was a child, to prevent me from growing up and consuming them? Or, for that matter, wouldn't my elder brother have eaten me while I was in the cradle, for much the same reason? Why do you insist on using such flawed, shitty logic? Are you really that bloody daft?
Don't answer that.
