Because by genetic testing, the children of [interracial] relationships are black, not "mixed." THIS IS WHAT A RACE TEST SHOWS. It also explains why they LOOK black. Use your fucking eyes.
This makes race mixing a form of genocide. If we're so big on preserving species, why not preserve races, too, especially the one that invented and discovered essentially EVERYTHING?
27 comments
There is no genetic evidence that seperates race. Read a book.
And I guess you don't count gunpowder, modern medicine, accurate calanders, and the ability to smelt iron in your definition of "everything". White people have discovered next to nothing.
Because by genetic testing, the children of brother-siser relationships in the South are retarded, not "mixed." THIS IS WHAT AN IQ TEST SHOWS! It also explains why they look stupid. Use your fucking eyes.
This makes incestual mixing a form of genocide. If we're so big on preserving species, why not preserve families, too?
There's a structure in the brain called the cingulate gyrus, a natural bullshit detector that keeps stupid things from being done. It can only filter errors from so many criteria, of course some go through, but how posts like this can go through is still hard to imagine.
"especially the one that invented and discovered essentially EVERYTHING?"
Yes, like the person who invented the multiple effect evaporator, or the one that discovered dozens of uses for peanuts. Oh, wait a second...
One thing that perplexes me, people say that we need is more diversity (which I believe is good as long as it is not forced upon people). On the other hand, if everyone were to eventually enter into interracial marriages, they'd end up having children of mixed race, eliminating all the current races (see "Race of the Future"). If everyone was mixed race, there would be no diversity since everyone would have the same skin color. So what I'm wondering is, if you truly believe in diversity, how does one support interracial marriage at the same time? I never really stopped to think about that.
@John Galt:
Because right now, there are too few mixed families. We want "diversity" which includes some mixed families and some not mixed. The purpose of "diversity" is not to create race rainbows, but to create a world in which you feel comfortable marrying whomever you please, regardless of race. More diversity would mean that white women who wanted to date black guys wouldn't be afraid to, and that there's no stigma attached to it.
"If we're so big on preserving species, why not preserve races, too, especially the one that invented and discovered essentially EVERYTHING?"
Is that the Chinese, or the Arabs?
Actually I'm pretty sure it was thinkers, philosophers, scientists, inventors, innovators, engineers and other assorted smart people that invented most of the technology we enjoy today.
I sure as hell wasn't insecure little twerps that hide behind their skin colour because they've never achieved anything off their own back!
@John Galt: Diversity already exists more in culture than in physical DNA, and human cultures aren't obliterated when people marry or have children. They're blended and modified, but not obliterated. I don't think that we'll ever have one universal human culture, but then I don't think that your hypothetical of everyone blending into one skin color will happen either.
Even if there weren't a stigma on interracial marriage, not everyone would do it. Allowing gay marriage doesn't turn everyone gay, allowing marriage between classes doesn't mean every golden boy with Roman numerals after his name is going to propose to a waitress, and allowing marriage between races doesn't mean that marriage within the same race won't happen.
(As for the OP...Yes, I would rather like to preserve the Arabs, being one myself. Unfortunately, your kind seem to be counterproductive to that aim.)
Um, you know, if you don't want to fuck a black person, there's nothing stopping you from not doing so.
Of course, you'd be hard pressed to find a white gal (or at least a smart one) to fuck with an attitude like that.
It's about as senseless as the anti-gay arguments.
The funny thing is that more than 25% of the white population of Virginia, for example, has, at least, one black ancestor. The limits are not clear, eh buddy?
Okay, so I'm white, my boyfriend is half-black, half-white. If we had a kid, it'd be 3/4 white and probably not "LOOK black" to any significant degree. Is that kid still black? No, because you're basing it off of jack shit and people aren't as easily divided as that.
@ #1106484
The fathers of the industrial revolution can go fuck themselves? I'm sure you'll be selling your computer, TV, stereo, car, and any other mass-produced items you possess then? As the industrial revolution is responsible for the existence of all those things!
No? Too inconvenient for you? Then you are a self-righteous, hypocritical dick head.
I "look" white to anyone on the street but am part Iroqouis. My mixed background hasn't hurt me. The doctor asks, "Do any close family members have...?", not "I sure hope you're pure white, or there could be problems."
I am of mixed heritage. Along with multiple 'white' races, my background includes Gypsies, Semites, and Mongolians. All comparatively dark skinned and dark haired people.
I have light red-brown hair and pale, freckled skin. My eyes are a shade of blue. If dominant genetic traits eradicate recessive ones, I should be tan and brown-eyed, but I'm not.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.