[On global warming.]
There doesn't seem to be one data set presented to the public that has not been twisted into submission to AGW alarmists. What a cluster f*k.
In the mean time, the politicians are STILL going around trying to arrange a world tax and an international government that is not elected by the peoples of the world. And... surprise, surprise, America is supposed to shoulder most of the costs.
I am so done with this charade. It IS time for the tar and feathers. Personally I'd like to see boiling in oil and burning at the stake revived.
34 comments
"There doesn't seem to be one data set presented to the public that has not been twisted into submission to AGW alarmists." Yeah, the air bubbles trapped in those ancient Antarctic ice cores sure were twisted into submission, all right.
Not that you believe that any of the layers below 4004 B.C. are real, of course.
"There doesn't seem to be one data set presented to the public that has not been twisted into submission to AGW alarmists."
Careful. Using phrases like "data set" make you sound all science-y and science is always wrong, remember?
"What a cluster f*k."
Indeed.
"In the mean time, the politicians are STILL going around trying to arrange a world tax and an international government that is not elected by the peoples of the world."
Excuse me?
"And... surprise, surprise, America is supposed to shoulder most of the costs."
Excuse me, again?
We can't shoulder two wars and a failing economy. Who the hell would expect us to run a world government and who the hell in their right mind would want us to?
"I am so done with this charade. It IS time for the tar and feathers. Personally I'd like to see boiling in oil and burning at the stake revived."
Good. Go start a letter writing campaign for that. It'll keep you off the internet at least.
"And... surprise, surprise, America is supposed to shoulder most of the costs"
*cough cough pollution per population cough*
And... surprise, surprise, America is supposed to shoulder most of the costs.
Seeing as america has been using considerably more of Earth's resources than its fair share, yeah, you should shoulder more of the cost.
"Personally I'd like to see boiling in oil and burning at the stake revived."
Why does this not surprise me? Right-wingers are always ready to invoke torture for people who disagree with them. And they're also the ones who say that waterboarding isn't torture.
@Jewsus: Of course it's religious. It's a subtext. The entire global warming denial is rooted in "God won't let us destroy the planet" (good stewardship be damned!)
Having any basis in scriptural doctrine has never been a stumbling block for these people. Their Christianity consists more of American nationalism and fascism than anything from the Bible.... what verses they do cherrypick are just to support their statements...
Bottom line, I don't know anyone who thinks in such harsh terms of science-denial, American supremacy (no matter what!) and violent medieval torture who ISN'T a dogmatic religious fundie.
"There doesn't seem to be one data set presented to the public that has not been twisted into submission..."
If you read nothing except material written by uneducated dolts with an agenda then why would anyone be surprised?
In the mean time, the politicians are STILL going around trying to arrange a world tax and an international government that is not elected by the peoples of the world.
But I bet you still call America "leader of the free world"
Well I would consider your point Chuck, but since someone on Conservapedia once said something stupid, we can now be confident that everything said by every right winger is equally stupid. So you were wrong before you even opened you mouth and every other thing you've ever said in your life was wrong as well.
Of course, I'm sure you think rejecting everything someone says because of an isolated mistake by someone unconnected to them is going beyond hasty generalisation and into the territory of sheer lunacy. But then, as we've already acertained, you're wrong. Right?
"Personally, I'd like to see boiling in oil and burning at the stake revived."
And yes, we will know you are christian by your love.
"Personally I'd like to see boiling in oil and burning at the stake revived."
Good thing muslims aren't in charge, because those people are brutal killers with no regard for civilized standards of behavior.
@ #1112634
If all the expostulations of "Die in a Fire" on this site are Fundy, then the OP is Fundy. Otherwise not. Rhetorical excess, hyperbole, exaggeration, overstatement are all accepted uses of language. Doesn't make the user Fundy.
The proper response still is to point to a data set that contradicts his claim.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
