Is referencing NAMBLA, like, a new Godwin or something?
5/23/2008 6:51:14 AM
Why is pedophilia always the first place these people go?
11/6/2010 3:21:00 AM
Nope, I would let the courts deal out penalties for crimes and misdemeanors.
NAMBLA are no friends of mine, that's for sure. I want them to be held accountable for their actions here and now, in this life.
11/6/2010 3:34:14 AM
"So you would not punish any sin? You have some fans in NAMBLA, that's for sure."
Well, you & your ilk certainly don't; and do, respectively, Blemonds:
And in all the time there's been Repubican adminisrations, surely with all the legal, political, and moral
muscle at your disposal (especially via your 'Moral Majority' lobbyists in the GOP), you & your hyper-moral Christian ilk would have completely eliminated that vile nest of paedo vipers way
before now, eh? So, considering the list featured in the above link, Why do NAMBLA still exist?
You do the maths, Blemonds.
I love the smell of destroyed arguments in the morning. Smells like... victory.
11/6/2010 9:08:06 AM
The link from Anon-e-moose is an eye-opener for anyone that blindy respects higher office
I once did a search on Baptists and Evangelists after some Fundie remarks on this site claimed only Catholic clergy have molested children. Not only found long lists just from the last few years but sites dedicated to Fundie preacher or moral figureheads many violations of all laws in the book.
Some of the quotes from those guilty of vile crimes were always attempts to assume a higher moral ground, like this ass
11/6/2010 9:30:45 AM
"The link from Anon-e-moose is an eye-opener for anyone that blindy respects higher office"
It's probably why you hardly see any fundies appear here in FSTDT to try and argue the toss with us (least of all from Ruptured Retards), although they have free and open right of reply; certainly when it comes to their so-called 'Christian morals'.
Because they know their 'arguments' would be utterly annihilated, and thus their own vile right-wing fundie hypocrisies would be exposed.
Probably why Troll4Life hasn't deigned to show 'her' face around here. Certainly after this:
A tip for free, 'dearie' (if you dare show your face round here again): If you don't want to argumentally paint yourself further into a logical corner - as you have here - then better stop your lies - and start ponying up facts
- with evidence - to the satisfaction of we Atheists.
It's the only way you'll ever gain any credibilty, certainly earn the right to have anything you say accepted or believed ever again. (And now this is the part where you threaten us with 'Hell', Troll4Life; threats. 'Psychological intimidation', the last resort of the fundie who knows he's lost the argument. What's that? We're not scared of your insipid 'threats of 'Turn or Burn', because we Atheists don't acknowledge that a 'Hell' exists? And why should you be surprised? Because anything you say doesn't have the right to be believed!
11/6/2010 10:49:10 AM
ETERNAL? no. that's overkill.
3/4/2011 1:15:24 PM
I'd punish sin. But for ETERNITY seems a bit overkill.
2/16/2012 8:13:30 PM