Quote# 70299

*gays in the military*

I garuntee that when they enlist they will be given free reign on who to hit on, and if a single heterosexual private complains he will be violating the homosexuals rights...

SPYDYR , RR 39 Comments [2/12/2010 11:15:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 42

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom


Don't be so fucking stupid.

1/27/2010 7:29:54 AM


I clicked off the link after a couple of posts.

So sad how much hate those people harbor. Really...

2/12/2010 11:18:05 PM

The Skeptic Wept

Hey, dumbass, you act like they are waiting to get in. Guess what? They've been there since there were armies.

But then, what do you expect from RR.

2/12/2010 11:31:36 PM

I can see spydyr's never been in the military, they have very strong regulations against any kind of public display of affection.

2/13/2010 2:15:47 AM


People and armies don't work that way!

2/13/2010 2:43:37 AM


Did somebody leave the idiot magnet on again?

2/13/2010 3:54:28 AM


We shouldn't let blacks in the military either, they'd just jump around with basketballs and as far as I know fighters can't survive on a diet of only watermelon.

2/13/2010 4:17:57 AM


More ignorance and lies from the raptards. No change there, then!

2/13/2010 4:35:00 AM


So if I complained about guys hitting on me, I'm violating their rights... right?

2/13/2010 6:56:03 AM

Table Rock

Yes, I'm sure that happened when women were allowed to serve.

2/13/2010 7:46:45 AM


Alexander the Great was gay. He conquered all of the known world in his time. The Spartans were essentially gay too. Three Words: Battle of Thermopylae.

Being gay makes the soldier no less well 'ard, and braver than a hetero. one.

My nephew tells me that there's two gay soldiers in the East Yorkshire Regiment he serves with in the British Army. They're in Afghanistan right now. They serve their country. They fight against the Taliban too. He & the rest of his pals have no problem with them.

So why do you, SPYDR?

2/13/2010 8:16:21 AM


I'm in the UK Armed Forces. We've allowed openly gay people to serve since 1999. And guess what? Nobody fucking cares. Seriously. It is completely inconsequential what your sexual orientation is, so long as you can do your job properly and efficiently.
You people really need to calm down.

2/13/2010 8:41:38 AM


Out of interest, how do we claim on that guarantee? That quote's faulty already.

2/13/2010 8:57:08 AM


There are already gays in the military, there have probably always been gays in the military.

Regardless of who you are hitting on, you should always use caution and respect.
And no, you do not have the right to be offended if someone finds you attractive.
If that someone persists, after you have said "no thank you, I'm not interested", then it's another matter.

2/13/2010 8:59:25 AM


Look into the difference between 'reign' and 'rein'. (Free rein means letting the horse go without your control...)

2/13/2010 9:10:47 AM

Doubting Thomas

I bet something similar was said when women were allowed to join the military, only blaming them for any assaults which may occur.

2/13/2010 9:17:53 AM


As a member of the military, I guarantee that upon enlistment, gay members will be expected to abide by the same code of conduct as straight members. This includes (but is not limited to), sexual harassment being disallowed.

2/13/2010 9:40:33 AM



And no, you do not have the right to be offended if someone finds you attractive.

I disagree. Being offended is an emotional response-certainly, they have the right to be offended, if that's their reaction. However, they don't have theright to act upon that feeling b limiting someone else's rights.

2/13/2010 9:48:36 AM

They're already in the military. They just want a little acceptance is all since they're putting their lives on the line to keep you twits safe.

2/13/2010 11:12:05 AM


Because we can never hold down a proper job because we're always dragging other men into the copy room, so it makes sense the gay men aren't allowed in the military.

Oh wait. Most of us have self control, and when we do a job...WE DO A JOB! Not turn everything into an opportunity to get laid.

Though I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Given their definition of "equality," when we say we want equality, it makes sense they should think we mean that we want the world to pander to us instead of them.

2/13/2010 11:15:13 AM


Like it's currently a violation of a man's rights if a woman rejects his advances?

2/13/2010 11:27:14 AM


And how do we collect when your guarantee proves false?

I ask not because it never happened that way in any of the countries that don't ban gays, but because you're statement shows you to be such a delusional idiot we need to get it down in writing ahead of time.

2/13/2010 12:31:20 PM


I am in the U.S. Army and I know of gays and lesbians that serve when I was on active duty and now in the reserves. No lesbian ever hit on me because they knew I was straight, did not express any homosexual tendencies, and/or were in a relationship already with a partner.

Sexual harrasment is a serious offense in the military no matter who is doing it to whom. Like szena says, if a female private were to complain that a male soldier was sexually harrasing her, it wouldn't be ingored as a "violation of male heterosexual rights" and treated as a case of sexual harrasment. Same would go if gays and lesbians were allowed to openly serve.

2/13/2010 12:32:29 PM

Old Viking

In basic training at Fort Knox I demanded the right to conduct a sexual orientation poll of our company before I would proceed any further.

2/13/2010 12:48:46 PM


I guarantee that you have no idea of life in the military.

2/13/2010 12:53:43 PM

1 2 | top: comments page