No. Treaty of Tripoli, and the 1st amendment.
2/12/2010 10:28:02 PM
So in a nutshell, it isn't your choice but it's still your fault! And you're still comparing gays to paedophiles.
*headdesk, headdesk, headdesk*
2/12/2010 10:28:39 PM
Sexual orientation =/= adultery, pedophilia.
You really have a tough time with the simple concept of CONSENT, huh?
2/12/2010 10:28:52 PM
Now you ARE born gay?
And it's still evil?
ok fuck this, really, go die in a hole.
2/12/2010 10:34:02 PM
Only two sentences in this post are true. They are "I think you are born with sexual preferences. You can be born with certain preferences". The rest is pure ignorance and bigotry.
2/12/2010 10:48:51 PM
"I just cant imagine that someone’s sexual preference outside of biblical marriage can be protected by any law in this country." Very honest. Basically the fundie approach to government. If it's not illegal, that means the government encourages it. Ergo, adultery and homosexuality are actively promoted and encouraged by the government.
2/12/2010 11:11:34 PM
Homophobia, part graham's number.
2/13/2010 2:23:07 AM
Well, why didn't he when I asked him to?
2/13/2010 6:25:53 AM
"I don't agree with this so it's wrong to make it law"
Yeah, that makes PERFECT sense.
2/13/2010 7:11:41 AM
No they are not. That's like saying that littering and murder are the same because they are both illegal...
Wait biblical marriage? Hindus can't get married then? What the hell?
2/13/2010 9:33:48 AM
"We are all born in sin."
And it's our fault... how?
"I just cant imagine that someone’s sexual preference outside of biblical marriage can be protected by any law in this country."
Okay. I guess I'll start off with 300 wives.
2/13/2010 9:43:49 AM
I don't believe in the concept of "sin". Right and wrong, yes, but those are decided based on what will hurt others or benefit others, not on what some imaginary friend might think.
Consenting adults having sex - hurts no-one - Right.
Adultery - hurts the spouse - Wrong
Having sex with many partners:
- if adultery - Wrong
- if all are consenting and unhitched - Right
Preying on minors - may hurt the minors - Wrong
They are far from "the same" and not all are perversions.
Regarding "biblical marriage" and the law I have two words for you; "First" and "Amendment".
Only a bath or a shower can cleanse these people and make them clean and presentable. But that goes for us all, right?
2/13/2010 9:46:18 AM
Nicht verstehen. Try English.
2/13/2010 1:47:59 PM
I just cant imagine that someone’s sexual preference outside of biblical marriage can be protected by any law in this country.
You are labouring under the misconception that there is such a thing as "Biblical marriage".
It doesn't exist.
2/13/2010 7:52:12 PM
Kiss my gay ass, luke.
2/13/2010 9:53:39 PM
Ted Haggard says Christ can cure the gay.
2/14/2010 1:36:37 AM
Someone who cannot stay faithful to their spouse is doing wrong because they're being dishonest with their SO. If they can't handle monogamy, they should engage in an open relationship AND use protection to protect themselves and their partners.
Someone who molests children is HARMING them, physically and/or mentally. Children cannot consent to sex. Molestation almost always causes psychological problems later in life. Same goes for rape.
Sleeping with multiple partners is only immoral if you're: A) Doing so while supposedly in a monogamous relationship, B) Infected with an STD and not informing them, or C) Giving your partner's a false impression of your intentions. It can be dangerous if you aren't using proper protection, but having unprotected sex isn't, in itself, immoral... unless you're infected with an STD and don't bother telling the person.
Sleeping with your own gender isn't even comparable to any of those. Sure, if a gay person cheats or molests a child, it's every bit as wrong as it would be for a straight person, but homosexuality in itself can't be compared to ANY of those things.
Gay rights are covered under A) Freedom of and from religious ideals, and B) Human rights in general.
2/14/2010 2:20:01 AM
Ok, why would God make them so in the first place?. YOu never understand the meaning of FREE WILL.
2/14/2010 4:58:02 AM
Just can't imagine until you read the first ammendment, eh?
2/14/2010 4:58:59 AM
There is a first ammendment and, anyway, I don't know you but I can't imagine me having sex with a woman. So?
2/16/2010 4:27:53 AM
Only Christ can cleanse these people and set them “straight”.
And as he is omnipotent, he clearly chooses not to.
And then he sends them to hell for it.
Way to demonstrate the benevolence of your god
2/16/2010 5:25:08 AM
"Although, I think a person with homosexual preferences is the same as someone who can’t stay faithful to their wife, or has sex with multiple partners, or someone who preys on minors, they are all the same and all are perversions. "
And now the argument, if you please?
3/1/2010 7:32:52 AM
What is it with these idiots about homosexuals?
5/9/2012 9:59:20 AM