"To force pro family institutions to employ gays (against their beliefs) would be as wrong as forcing daycares to employ pedophiles."
Care to say that to the face of one David Furnish, certainly with his lawyer present, along with the press present, outside the High Court in London...?
...what's that, you say? You don't know who Mr. Furnish is? Well, let's just say that would you equally say the same to the face of (along with the lawyer of) - with the press present & outside the High Court - of his partner Elton John?
Ah, and that's where your entire argument completely ceases to exist. Because here in the UK - where your precious US Constitution has no jurisdiction - has ultra-brutal & hyper-savage libel and slander laws; more so than those in the US.
I'd hazard a guess that no amount of money would save you from what our laws - certainly our solicitors & QCs - are capable of; after the legal/financial evisceration they'd do to you, far worse than what the Cenobites (in the "Hellraiser" films) are capable of doing to their victims, you'd be begging for a ten trillion-year holiday in Hell, from ten minutes of what said lawyers here can inflict on you.
You like to hide behind the apron of your precious '1st Amendment', don't you? But realise that with rights, come responsibilities. Like I say: Go and tell gay men that they're 'pedophiles' - to their faces. Better be prepared to put your legal money where your mouth is, though: literally.
'Opinions', such as yours? They should be illegal. [/Irony]
'Natural Belief'? Well, seeing as even the Bible is inadmissable as evidence in a court of law, tell it to the judge, pal.