Quote# 7045

There are a great number of scientist who reject evolution on both a scientific basis and a theological basis. The conclusion of evolutionists is based, not on data, but on their assumption that there can be no supernatural explanationfor the universe.

deacon, Baptist.org Board 7 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

1 | bottom

Aaaaand your conclusion about scientists is based not on data, but on your desire to prove the bible, and all your cockamamie theories, correct above all else.

2/20/2008 4:31:20 PM


By the last time:


6/23/2008 7:59:25 PM

Anonymous Tau

Methodological Naturalism

Never leave home without it.

If you want the benefits but not the methods, then you're hypocrites.

7/2/2010 4:21:57 AM


"their assumption that there can be no supernatural explanationfor the universe"

And where, pray, is there any scientist stopping any ghosts from appearing to them, and agreeing to be tested & analysed in strict laboratory conditions (a la the JREF), nor your so-called 'God' from appearing to them in physical form (and proving he is who he says he is to their satisfaction), similarly agreeing to be examined & analysed by them (to see what makes him tick), then 'God' replicating that described in Genesis again, only this time, said processes of his 'creation' being analysed as well?

Unless of course, the only thing stopping your so-called 'God' from doing so is the very fact that he doesn't fuckimg exist. I can say without fear of contradiction, that the only one making an 'assumption' (as to the supposed 'existence' of the 'Supernatural') is you, deacon. By claiming that a 'God' exists, when you can't prove it in the first place, you only make an ASS out of U, and not ME.

One more thing: Evolution =/= Cosmology. That's what you assumed. Remember: when you 'assume', you make an ASS out of U, and not ME. Ergo...:


7/2/2010 8:08:44 AM

Quantum Mechanic

"a great number"

Yes, zero is a great number.

8/8/2014 11:47:37 AM


Any scientists who would reject evolution based solely on a theological basis are not credible. Science is meant to deal only in facts based on observations and testing. It is not meant to be mishandled by people who assume that the Bible is inerrantly the word of God.

8/8/2014 12:00:25 PM


"a great number of scientists"? You mean "fewer than pro-evolution scientists called Steve (or some version of that name)", right?

There is no "theological basis" for biology, stupid!

The "evolutionists" aren't the ones assuming things about supernatural explanations, stupid.
Besides, as long as you can't provide evidence for said supernatural explanation, it's completely irrelevant.

8/9/2014 3:26:49 AM

1 | top: comments page