1
#18361
Papabear
\"Dr.\" Kent Hovind is a liar and a fraud with a PhD from a diploma mill.
Carbon 14 dating is not used on dinosaur bones because Carbon 14 dating is not accurate at ages above about 50,000 years.
Yes, they use another method of dating which gives an \"age closer to the desired result,\" that is, an accurate result.
3/1/2006 2:15:17 AM
#46135
Zipperback
Also DINOSAUR \"BONES\" DON'T HAVE ORGANIC CARBON. The majority of the fossil mass is replaced through permineralization. It's mostly silicates, not carbon.
6/24/2006 11:01:58 PM
#938866
Tom S. Fox
Hey, Hovind, you idiot, we cannot carbon-date this, there is no fucking carbon in it!
4/13/2009 6:04:06 AM
#939035
Slayer
They were not carbon dated because it makes no damn sense to carbon date them.
4/13/2009 12:33:01 PM
#1266910
Kuyohashi
They weren't carbon-dated because the process didn't exist during the 19th Century.
3/14/2011 11:59:22 AM
#1266912
JohnTheAtheist
First of all we don't have any dinosaur bones. We have fossils of dinosaur bones. There is no carbon.
Kent Hovind is the dumbest motherfucker on the planet by the way.
3/14/2011 12:03:08 PM
#1266948
jas43
oooooooooooooooo its all been figured out and uncovered!!!!!!
noooooo!!!!
3/14/2011 1:22:37 PM
#1267088
Canadiest
Hovind has never pointed anything out, he just lies about everything. His credentials, his income, Christian history, Christian accomplishments, America History, Scientific findings, European history, Scientific consensus,,, well you get the point,,He's a huge liar.
3/15/2011 5:45:12 AM
#1267093
Justanotheratheist
Hovind's historical musings are as accurate as his tax returns.
3/15/2011 6:09:21 AM
#1267124
Anon-e-moose
Dr. Kent Hovind pointed out that when Bubba's bone was found in his arse, it was part of the carbon-based lifeform that was Bubba who was a few decades old. Because this would not match the ass of Kentypoos based on the column of Bubba, so another method was used which would give the desired result.
>:D
3/15/2011 9:08:04 AM
1