1 2 3
#1122466
Smilodon
This seems more like a CSTDT thing than FSTDT, but I'll let it slide simply for the religion=morality part.
Oh, and...
2/20/2010 6:11:06 PM
#1122467
Tyler
FSTDT and CSTDT. Just needed RSTDT and it would have been a perfect trifecta.
2/20/2010 6:11:38 PM
#1122469
Old Viking
We do not use counterfiet (sic) archeological finds to prove evolution. Mostly because archeology has nothing to do with biology. The rest of your post is hysteria.
2/20/2010 6:16:03 PM
#1122470
Wehpudicabok
That bizarre shot at psychology made me think for a second that this was a Scientologist. Meh, all fundies think alike, I guess...
2/20/2010 6:18:53 PM
#1122471
Zoo
"scientists . . . SELL out to the highest bidder"
Sure. Every last one of them. Which is why they have to work so hard to get money for their work. . . they're all just waiting for someone with money to come along, principles and good science be damned.
"Atheists forge counterfiet Archeological finds to prove evolution "
How would that help anything? Archaeology is generally about modern humans.
"Texts books with KNOWN frauds are still taught as science facts"
Yes. Because text books are expensive (which is why I learned the five kingdom system in 9th grade, years after it was out of date), and secondary school teachers don't necessarily keep up with science (and unfortunately some aren't that up with science to begin with). In any case, frauds don't disprove science. They, as well as more general outdatedness, DO make it more difficult when interested students get to college. . . I watched a lot of classmates struggle with re-learning the basic stuff we were taught wrong at earlier stages.
"God has not designed Religion to be source of morality and faith and teachings of righteousness"
This might be the only thing we agree on.
2/20/2010 6:20:02 PM
#1122482
Science is based on observation and experiments. The Bible was based on ideas and some propaganda. One allows for changes based on what we can see with our own senses, the other puts its fingers in its ears and yells "LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LA LA LA LA IF I CAN'T HEAR IT THEN IT'S NOT TRUE LA LA LA".
2/20/2010 6:36:36 PM
#1122484
The Odd Goat
*edits wikipedia*
FUCK YEAH, I'M IN THE CIA!
2/20/2010 6:37:03 PM
#1122486
The Odd Goat
double post sry
2/20/2010 6:38:00 PM
#1122492
JohnTheAtheist
So, everything is wrong except a 2000 old book?
2/20/2010 6:43:58 PM
#1122497
werewolf
Flunked college again, didja?
2/20/2010 6:56:06 PM
#1122500
Rumpshaker slim
Wikipedia is controlled by the cia? Really? For what purpose? To what end?
I get the feeling this guys only experience with psychology stems from him being ordered by a judge to undergo treatment for his paranoid delusions.
Remember that tinfoil hat won't stop the Illuminati agent posing as your mailman from reading your thoughts. It just looks silly.
2/20/2010 6:58:36 PM
#1122505
WMDKitty
Oh, shut the fuck up, you uneducated, ignorant douchebag.
2/20/2010 7:02:38 PM
#1122511
John
scientists as well as politicians SELL out to the highest bidder
That's for sure. Look how the oil industry has managed to find a handful of science quacks and use them to bamboozle people into denying climate change. Tobacco did the same thing in the 50's with lung cancer, and all the dumb smokers said the same things about "scientists" that the climate change deniers say today.
2/20/2010 7:23:23 PM
#1122514
Jon
CTSTDT, too, for extra bonus points.
2/20/2010 7:32:34 PM
#1122520
Elia
Good grief, we've found a rare Scientologist-Christan crossbreed! Someone get the lab ready!
Off topic: What's higher than (more than?) a trifecta?
2/20/2010 7:37:26 PM
#1122525
Lucilius
"If there's ONE thing I've learned about reality it's that it doesn't sync with my prejudices and superstitions, so I'm going to pretend that reality conspires against me."
2/20/2010 7:48:32 PM
#1122530
Mudak
I thought that Wickipedia was the encyclopedia of candles. What would the CIA even want to do with it?
2/20/2010 7:59:38 PM
#1122532
Tolpuddle Martyr
Scientists sell out to the highest bidder? Lets take a guess now, who has more money the petrochemical companies or the environmentalists? Hmm, let me think...
2/20/2010 8:06:05 PM
#1122533
TGRwulf
Atheists are teh debil!
2/20/2010 8:08:34 PM
#1122534
Teb
It really is quite telling that all these "anti-science, anti-education" rants from these people are all filled with horrible grammar & spelling. Really is amazing. Sad, but amazing.
2/20/2010 8:08:54 PM
#1122539
campbunny
But my term papers are based on primary sources! Isn't that true of all post-secondary enquiry? Oh wait, you've never set foot on a university campus and basically imagine it as a sort of grade three for adults.
2/20/2010 8:17:57 PM
#1122542
Yup but this guys pastor at his mega church is not corrupt at all right?
2/20/2010 8:28:08 PM
#1122551
breakerslion
"...no one is in our generation is trustworthy."
But we're supposed to believe you?
2/20/2010 8:45:06 PM
#1122556
Caretaker
@ The Odd Goat: Congratulations on winning this thread!
2/20/2010 8:59:15 PM
#1122561
Well, two out of 3 ain't bad.
2/20/2010 9:20:28 PM
1 2 3