Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 7079

First of the Bible/Jesus/Nostradamus states certain events that will triger the days to the second coming, such as famin, plagues, etc. One of the things Cisco will point out is the prediction of certain figures. The False Prophets, and the 3 Anti-christs <u>The False Prophets</u> : Said to be men/man/women that will blaspheme and battle with the word of God. Preaching to the world lies that will convince them that God is fake, hense preparing the road for the third false Jesus. Numerous passages in the bible states that the Anti-christ will come before the 3 anti-christ, and will preach false testimonies. Well their HAS BEEN such preaching, The false prophets have been in this world even before the birth of your grandparents. And those false prophets can be identified as SCIENTISTS. I mean think of it! Bible says creation-Science says evolution, etc. Science is the only thing that dismisses the word of God and minipulate people from making them think the Bible/God is a hoax or a form of the human imagination.

cisco, Christian Forums 6 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Julian

An award well earnt!

7/10/2006 7:31:37 AM

Karana

Blah, blah, science is the anti- Christ, as you use things and ideas found by science everyday. You are therefore a tool of the Anti-Christ. Do you want to revoke your words now?

12/24/2011 12:19:10 AM

Quantum Mechanic

"triger(sic)"

And I quit reading.

4/27/2012 1:53:51 PM

Swede

Science doesn't concern itself with any gods, as it's aimed at studying reality and learn how things work.

Science has always been around (since the first time a hominid picked up a rock and sharpened a stick with it), in one form or another, as has criticism and doubt of religions, famines and plagues. It's like saying "when the sky is blue and Thursday comes before Friday, the Anti-Christ is coming".

4/28/2012 2:22:17 AM

Crimson Lizard

Is this guy referring to himself in the third person?

7/11/2013 7:37:12 AM

Anon-e-moose

1- Speaking in the third person. You're a loony. You FAIL.

2- Scientists = 'False Prophets'? As opposed to, say... Harold Camping? I trust and accept what the weather forecasters from the Met Office - with their meteorological stations, satellites (and of course as scientists, the UK's Met Office shares all it's data with their counterparts in other countries, natch) and supercomputers to crunch all the terabytes of data they go through every day - say, thanks. You FAIL II.

3- Science deals only in FACTS. A rainbow (back to Meteorology!) doesn't actually physically exist, but at least it can be seen. Certainly explained. Where does that leave you & your so-called 'God'? You FAIL III, and have struck out, cisco.

Moral: How can meteorologists be 'false prophets', when they get it right - with the evidence to back up what they say - more times than the likes of Harold Camping?! Three out of three for him, and like all of his 'prophecies' from the Bible no less, you & your 'Word of God' completely FAILS.

7/11/2013 10:18:50 AM
1