WYSIWYG What you see is what you get!!
That's not exactly a hard and fast rule of reality, if it were then it would be fairly reasonable to assume that all gold coins could unwrapped to find chocolate inside.
The Biblical geocentric model of the universe is called WYSIWYG
The bible doesn't detail anything that could be called a "model" of the universe.
True science is supposed to be based on observation.
And it was odservation that gave rise to the heliocentric model of the solar system. Geocentrism is not based n observation but rather based in bilnd obedience to biblical dogma and fanfic.
We see the array of stars wheeling around the earth approximately daily and we motorize our telescopes to follow their steady motion.
We also see the relative positions of those star change by a certain degree from season to season, that also happens to be the same degree as the earth's axis. Under the geocentric model that would require the entire universe to spin on an axis for no apparent reason.
We see the sun rising and setting daily. We see the planets doing roughly the same thing, and we see the moon following them on a somewhat different schedule,
And that what you would expect to see from a vantage point on a large spinning body. Just another example of what you see not being what you get.
all revolving around the earth as our eyes testify.
The eyes can be fooled as any first grader could tell you. From the vantage point of a large spinning body things will appear to spin around you, but it doesn't mean that they do. You change your vantage point and the motion will change.
There is no justification at all from what we observe to arbitrarily assume the stars to be fixed and the earth rotating.
Astrophysics doesn't "assume" that the stars, or any other body of mass are "fixed". They are in motion, just not they way you assert that they are. Further more, no one arbitrarily "assumes" that the earth rotates, it's rotation can and has been observed from orbit.
The beauty of geocentricity is that what you see is what you get! It is a simple and readily understandable scenario for those who are willing to believe what their eyes tell them, and make the mental transition back to the instinctive reference frame of a stationary earth.
Just because it's easier for you to comprehend or understand physics with a geocentric model doesn't mean that it true. I'm sorry you have so much trouble understanding heliocentrism but that doesn't mean that it isn't true and provable. To hold to a geocentric model you must write off over a century of established, observed, and verified science as nothing more than lies or conspiracies intended to decieve the "true believer". Not only that but you would also need to invalidate the very physics of sattelite technology that allows you to disseminate your idiocy across the world.
There is plenty of direct and observed evidence of heliocentrism, or do you also expect everyone to believe that every single astronaut, from all the countries that have sent people into space, are all involved in a giant conspiracy to cover up geocentrism or destroy christianity by disproving the bible?