1 2 3
#1125103
louislois
"No one is circle-jerking to Palin except liberals who can't get laid and need some fantasy life. Oh yes, you KNOW that's true. You guys have such a hard-on for her because you know she's a real woman, unlike the always-angry, crystal-wearing, Prius-driving, always-have-a-headache, tofu-eating, organic-veggie-vegan women you're stuck with."
Yes you found us out. All us liberals wish our women could be more like this:
lol
2/24/2010 4:59:57 AM
#1125115
aaa
You know what is the worst thing about this quote? The person who typed that crap really means it.
2/24/2010 5:07:30 AM
#1125116
Hank
Unfortunately, these people are serious. Google the Dunning-Kruger effect.
2/24/2010 5:10:44 AM
#1125122
Liberals can't get laid? Oh, puhleez. You've got McCain, Rove, Ailes, Limbaugh, Cheney. We've got Obama, Clinton, Clooney etc. Who's really getting laid?
Liberals talk about Sarah Palin because she is a train wreck from which we can not look away.
2/24/2010 5:17:46 AM
#1125126
Mathew
"No one is circle-jerking to Palin except liberals who can't get laid and need some fantasy life."
Strange, I always thought redneck conservatives were the ones circle-jerking to Sarah Palin.
2/24/2010 5:20:14 AM
#1125130
It was your free-market, trickle-down, deregulated, right-wing bullshit that fucked up the economy.
From the Great Depression to the current mess, which really started with Ronald Reagan but greatly accelerated under Bush, your cult has proven disastrous to the economy over and over again, but you never learn.
2/24/2010 5:27:14 AM
#1125156
David B.
Projection. Look it up.
2/24/2010 6:08:10 AM
#1125160
Smilodon
Someone said Sarah Palin. You know what that means...
2/24/2010 6:17:21 AM
#1125172
TGRwulf
Um, Wyatt, you do realize that most REPUBLICANS don't even want Palin to run anymore right?
2/24/2010 6:31:49 AM
#1125180
Arctic Knight
@louislois
I still think her real name is Dan Coulter. With that adam's apple and horse face, I bet she's packing more under that skirt than most women. She probably joins in the Palin circle jerk.
2/24/2010 6:38:36 AM
#1125204
Hakar
Wow, butthurt much?
2/24/2010 7:01:03 AM
#1125225
LadyJafaria
You seem to have confused "liberal" with "hippie." There's no lifestyle requirement to being a liberal; it's a system of political belief. I know you've conflated conservatism with some of the non-political things your base does, but please don't do the same thing for us. I've met truck-driving, meat-eating, 100% crystal-free liberals, but even if I hadn't the flaky ones wouldn't need to justify themselves to people like you.
2/24/2010 7:17:45 AM
#1125227
GigaGuess
No one is circle-jerking to Palin except liberals who can't get laid and need some fantasy life. Oh yes, you KNOW that's true. You guys have such a hard-on for her because you know she's a real woman, unlike the always-angry, crystal-wearing, Prius-driving, always-have-a-headache, tofu-eating, organic-veggie-vegan women you're stuck with. (i.e. Professor Amy Bishop!)
YAY for intentionally ignoring what he means in favor of the literal definition!
2/24/2010 7:19:13 AM
#1125231
Freboy
"Send your name and address and an Amy Bishop tee shirt will be on it's way to your door!"
Rule #1 when insulting someone else: Spell correctly.
2/24/2010 7:21:48 AM
#1125234
You know, you right-wingers really piss me the fuck off when you reduce national politics to a goddamn "who's got hotter women" contest. But then you make me laugh by saying that liberal women are always angry as if Sarah Palin isn't seething with anger and spite every time she opens her mouth. The woman is in the news every week ripping into someone for some perceived insult or other, and she even acts like it's a personal affront to her when the President of the United States doesn't take her retarded advice on running the country. Why would Obama take advice from a whiny LOSER?
I'm not even going to try to address the "Bush was a progressive" crap, except to wonder if him being a "progressive" kept you from voting for him twice. I'll bet the answer is no...
2/24/2010 7:22:31 AM
#1125242
FSMpirate
Wha.. Wait... I don't even...
2/24/2010 7:27:31 AM
#1125257
Ok, but still, Republican lost because of the mess Bush did. Signed, guess who?. Sarah Palin.
2/24/2010 7:35:57 AM
#1125265
I Read About The Afterlife
Oh yerp! Real women shoot elk for helicopters all the time! That is such a turn on!
Bush was a progressive? Are you fucking kidding me?
2/24/2010 7:41:26 AM
#1125295
Mister Spak
You guys were circle jerking to Dumbya until he wrecked the economy, then you try to rewrite history to make him an American. That miserable failure is hanging around your neck no matter how hard you try to get rid of it.
2/24/2010 8:21:08 AM
#1125297
Blasphemina
You're a moron. No one but you sex-obsessed fundies with your five hundred pound "saving it all for Jeebus" wives see anything attractive, physically or politically, about La Palin.
2/24/2010 8:22:13 AM
#1125314
True Scotsman
There's so much stupid in this, too much to get into really.
However, "BUSH WAS A PROGRESSIVE" (all-caps natch) really says it all.
(What do you bet that during his regime Wyatt's torch was singing his praises?)
2/24/2010 8:34:53 AM
#1125334
misshani
Liberals don't need Sarah Palin. We have her good twin, Tina Fey.
Conservatives have been calling for abstinance-only education, while banning birth control and abortion, because unwanted children are the intended "consequence" of sex that should be forced on "filthy sluts" to teach them a lesson. But denying a man sex should be a crime punishable by rape. All the while bashing gays to deny their own homosexuality, downloading more porn than blue states, and wanting to replace the Constitution with the teachings of churches that hide pedophilia.
And they think liberals have issues with sex because we want to teach the facts and leave consenting adults alone?
2/24/2010 8:51:24 AM
#1125351
I wish people who claimed that everything was great in the free markets prior to the Great Depression, would explain the Gilded Age. I've never heard a good explanation as to how such a disparity of income was a good thing during that time of almost absolute free-markets.
2/24/2010 9:19:59 AM
#1125369
Cathasach
As usual, you guys love to redefine words. Do you even know what progressive means? It's generally a good thing, and doesn't necessarily mean "liberal", although your kind doesn't know what "liberal" means either, come to think of it.
Progressive means promoting progress. It's right there in the fucking word, for Jeebus' sake! Bush was, if anything, REgressive.
2/24/2010 9:42:27 AM
#1125376
Zeus Almighty
@ Cathasach
In three years, two months, six days and 16 hours conservatards will be claiming Bush ran a Democrat (sic) administration.
Hell, maybe even sooner. Recall that when the Mark Foley, Larry Craig and Mark Sanford scandals broke Faux News identified all on screen as a "D".
2/24/2010 9:51:33 AM
1 2 3