The Gita is lovely and seemingly profound in its teachings, but unlike the Bible it has no evidence to show it is anything other than the fictional work of a man.
[10/1/2002 12:00:00 ]
Fundie Index: 2
The bible doesn't -either-, numbnuts!
Neither does the bible!
The babble doesn't have any evidence showing it to be the work of god either.
I'm not entirely sure what the Gita is but I'm sure it can pull afew vague as fuck prophecies out of its ass to prove its divinity.
The Bible IS the fictional work of man.
The Gita makes no claim that it is divine, and is FAR older than the Bible, plus it is incorporated into the Mahabharata which is even older by over 3500 years.
And what is the bible's proof? Please answer without referring to the bible.
The Gita is lovely and seemingly profound in its teachings, but like the Bible, which is ugly and obviously written by stupid, vindictive assholes, it has no evidence to show it is anything other than the fictional work of man.
Show evidence that the Bible is more before you start making statements like that. The arrogance is... well, rather becoming, considering that you're a fundy.
a mind far far away
First prove that the bible IS written by god and not by man, and then you might have an arugument, although you'd still have to find a way to correct the thousands of lies in it.
What difference does it make to the people at RR? They haven't read either the Gita or the bible!
Show me evidence for divinity within the Bible please, and no saying the Bible says it's true is not good enough.